123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12478517)
1. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty.
Argenson JN; Komistek RD; Aubaniac JM; Dennis DA; Northcut EJ; Anderson DT; Agostini S
J Arthroplasty; 2002 Dec; 17(8):1049-54. PubMed ID: 12478517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo determination of posterior femoral rollback for subjects having a NexGen posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Bertin KC; Komistek RD; Dennis DA; Hoff WA; Anderson DT; Langer T
J Arthroplasty; 2002 Dec; 17(8):1040-8. PubMed ID: 12478516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vivo comparison of knee kinematics for subjects having either a posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty.
Cates HE; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Schmidt MA; Anderle M
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):1057-67. PubMed ID: 18534487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo determination of kinematics for subjects having a Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System.
Akizuki S; Mueller JK; Horiuchi H; Matsunaga D; Shibakawa A; Komistek RD
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):963-71. PubMed ID: 18701238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo determination of total knee arthroplasty kinematics: a multicenter analysis of an asymmetrical posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.
Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Bertin KC; Rosenberg A; Kennedy W
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jan; 23(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 18165027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No deterioration of kinematics and cruciate function 10 years after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.
Hollinghurst D; Stoney J; Ward T; Gill HS; Newman JH; Murray DW; Beard DJ
Knee; 2006 Dec; 13(6):440-4. PubMed ID: 16973362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Knee biomechanics after UKA and its relation to the ACL--a robotic investigation.
Suggs JF; Li G; Park SE; Sultan PG; Rubash HE; Freiberg AA
J Orthop Res; 2006 Apr; 24(4):588-94. PubMed ID: 16514655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):114-30. PubMed ID: 12771822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty in deep knee bending motion.
Watanabe T; Yamazaki T; Sugamoto K; Tomita T; Hashimoto H; Maeda D; Tamura S; Ochi T; Yoshikawa H
J Orthop Res; 2004 Sep; 22(5):1044-9. PubMed ID: 15304277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Hopkins AR; New AM; Rodriguez-y-Baena F; Taylor M
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 19897397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femoral rollback of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements: in vivo fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living.
Fantozzi S; Catani F; Ensini A; Leardini A; Giannini S
J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2222-9. PubMed ID: 17019683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoral rollback after cruciate-retaining and stabilizing total knee arthroplasty.
Most E; Zayontz S; Li G; Otterberg E; Sabbag K; Rubash HE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):101-13. PubMed ID: 12771821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
Li G; Papannagari R; Most E; Park SE; Johnson T; Tanamal L; Rubash HE
J Orthop Res; 2005 May; 23(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 15885472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How effective are added constraints in improving TKR kinematics?
van Duren BH; Pandit H; Beard DJ; Zavatsky AB; Gallagher JA; Thomas NP; Shakespeare DT; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Biomech; 2007; 40 Suppl 1():S31-7. PubMed ID: 17433336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic in vitro measurement of posterior cruciate ligament load and tibiofemoral stress after TKA in dependence on tibiofemoral slope.
Ostermeier S; Schlomach C; Hurschler C; Windhagen H; Stukenborg-Colsman C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 16494980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties under passive and weight-bearing conditions.
Yoshiya S; Matsui N; Komistek RD; Dennis DA; Mahfouz M; Kurosaka M
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Sep; 20(6):777-83. PubMed ID: 16139716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament.
Komistek RD; Allain J; Anderson DT; Dennis DA; Goutallier D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):315-25. PubMed ID: 12439275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.
Musahl V; Plakseychuk A; VanScyoc A; Sasaki T; Debski RE; McMahon PJ; Fu FH
Am J Sports Med; 2005 May; 33(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 15722268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient.
Dalury DF; Fisher DA; Adams MJ; Gonzales RA
Orthopedics; 2009 Apr; 32(4):. PubMed ID: 19388619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
