These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12478632)

  • 1. Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?
    Grobman WA; Dooley SL; Welshman EE; Pergament E; Calhoun EA
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Dec; 22(13):1195-200. PubMed ID: 12478632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The utility assessment of Chinese pregnant women towards the birth of a baby with Down syndrome compared to a procedure-related miscarriage.
    Chan YM; Leung TN; Leung TY; Fung TY; Chan LW; Lau TK
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Sep; 26(9):819-24. PubMed ID: 16832829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women.
    Caughey AB; Washington AE; Kuppermann M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 198(3):333.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18177830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferences.
    Kuppermann M; Nease RF; Learman LA; Gates E; Blumberg B; Washington AE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 11004350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do women prefer to have screening tests for Down syndrome that have the lowest screen-positive rate or the highest detection rate?
    Mulvey S; Zachariah R; McIlwaine K; Wallace EM
    Prenat Diagn; 2003 Oct; 23(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 14558028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter most.
    Kuppermann M; Feeny D; Gates E; Posner SF; Blumberg B; Washington AE
    Prenat Diagn; 1999 Aug; 19(8):711-6. PubMed ID: 10451513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fitting observed and theoretical choices - women's choices about prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome.
    Seror V
    Health Econ; 2008 May; 17(5):557-77. PubMed ID: 17806133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Miscarriage after invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures: how much risk our pregnant women are willing to take?
    Chan YM; Sahota DS; Chan OK; Leung TY; Lau TK
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Sep; 29(9):870-4. PubMed ID: 19499531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term trends for socio-economic differences in prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: diffusion of services or persistence of disparities?
    Khoshnood B; De Vigan C; Blondel B; Vodovar V; Cadio E; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1087-95. PubMed ID: 18518869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socioeconomic and state-level differences in prenatal diagnosis and live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome in the United States.
    Khoshnood B; Pryde P; Blondel B; Lee KS
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2003 Dec; 51(6):617-27. PubMed ID: 14967994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenatal genetic diagnosis and elective abortion in women over 35: utilization and relative impact on the birth prevalence of Down syndrome in Washington State.
    Luthy DA; Emanuel I; Hoehn H; Hall JG; Powers EK
    Am J Med Genet; 1980; 7(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 6451173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. History of miscarriage and increased incidence of fetal aneuploidy in subsequent pregnancy.
    Bianco K; Caughey AB; Shaffer BL; Davis R; Norton ME
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 107(5):1098-102. PubMed ID: 16648416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the decision-making process regarding amniocentesis following a screen-positive maternal serum screen result.
    Kobelka C; Mattman A; Langlois S
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 May; 29(5):514-9. PubMed ID: 19242922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study.
    Bishop AJ; Marteau TM; Armstrong D; Chitty LS; Longworth L; Buxton MJ; Berlin C
    BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):775-9. PubMed ID: 15270923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women's preferences in screening for Down syndrome.
    Deverill M; Robson S
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Sep; 26(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16845681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: are women's perceptions changing?
    Gidiri M; McFarlane J; Holding S; Lindow S
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):458-61. PubMed ID: 17378818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal education modifies the age-related increase in the birth prevalence of Down syndrome.
    Khoshnood B; Wall S; Pryde P; Lee KS
    Prenat Diagn; 2004 Feb; 24(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 14974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years.
    Biggio JR; Morris TC; Owen J; Stringer JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):721-9. PubMed ID: 15042005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are pregnant Australian women well informed about prenatal genetic screening? A systematic investigation using the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice.
    Rowe HJ; Fisher JR; Quinlivan JA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 46(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 16953859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal decision to terminate pregnancy in case of Down syndrome.
    Korenromp MJ; Page-Christiaens GC; van den Bout J; Mulder EJ; Visser GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 196(2):149.e1-11. PubMed ID: 17306660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.