165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12479289)
1. Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs.
Kleine P; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Simon A; Moritz A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):857-63. PubMed ID: 12479289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans.
Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H; Perthel M; Wesemeyer D; Laas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical heart valves].
Perthel M; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Kupper W; Laas J
Z Kardiol; 2001; 90 Suppl 6():100-4. PubMed ID: 11826811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-intensity transient signals (HITS) as a parameter for optimum orientation of mechanical aortic valves.
Kleine P; Perthel M; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Laas J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Dec; 48(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 11145405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medtronic Hall versus St. Jude Medical mechanical aortic valve: downstream turbulences with respect to rotation in pigs.
Kleine P; Perthel M; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Paulsen PK; Riis C; Laas J
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):548-55. PubMed ID: 9793855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.
Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early experience with the new Masters series of St. Jude Medical heart valve: in vivo hemodynamic and clinical results in patients with narrowed aortic annulus.
Zingg U; Aeschbacher B; Seiler C; Althaus U; Carrel T
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Sep; 6(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 9330177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves.
Masters RG; Helou J; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
Iwahashi K; Ota T; Okada M; Tsukube T; Matsuda H
Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Downstream turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) following aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Hall or St. Jude Medical valve substitutes.
Kleine P; Perthel M; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Hansen SB; Laas J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2000 Jan; 17(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10735407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial in vivo results of the new Medtronic Advantage(TM) bileaflet valve in aortic position and comparison to the SJM.
Kleine P; Klesius AA; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Moritz A
Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 10(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 12379409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chronic, preclinical assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis.
Rakow N; Nelson D; McClay C; Rose R; Leuer L; Boldt C; Shecterle L; St Cyr J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 12479288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position.
Hartrumpf M; Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Wendt MO; Pohl M; Albes JM
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 16208612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 20 mm Medtronic Hall prosthesis in the small aortic root.
Aris A; Ramirez I; Camara ML; Carreras F; Borras X; Pons-Llado G
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jul; 5(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 8858514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of ATS prosthetic valve by doppler echocardiography: comparison with St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve.
Hasegawa M
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Aug; 6(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 11042481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
