These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12479502)

  • 1. Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery.
    Gregory KD; Korst LM; Gornbein JA; Platt LD
    Health Serv Res; 2002 Oct; 37(5):1387-401. PubMed ID: 12479502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Meikle SF; Steiner CA; Zhang J; Lawrence WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):751-6. PubMed ID: 15802401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elective primary caesarean delivery: accuracy of administrative data.
    Korst LM; Gregory KD; Gornbein JA
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2004 Mar; 18(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 14996250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.
    Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):515.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27210064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in elective primary cesarean delivery by patient and hospital factors.
    Gregory KD; Korst LM; Platt LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1521-32; discussion 1532-4. PubMed ID: 11408876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elective cesarean delivery for term breech.
    Krebs L; Langhoff-Roos J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 101(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 12681872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of introducing specific measures to reduce the frequency of cesarean delivery for non-obstetric indications.
    Psenkova P; Bucko M; Braticak M; Baneszova R; Zahumensky J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 142(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 29577273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The University of British Columbia.
    Klein MC
    Birth; 2013 Jun; 40(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 24635469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Term elective induction of labour and perinatal outcomes in obese women: retrospective cohort study.
    Lee VR; Darney BG; Snowden JM; Main EK; Gilbert W; Chung J; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 26840780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Darney BG; Snowden JM; Cheng YW; Jacob L; Nicholson JM; Kaimal A; Dublin S; Getahun D; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 24084532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.
    Henry OA; Gregory KD; Hobel CJ; Platt LD
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Aug; 85(8 Pt 1):1143-6. PubMed ID: 7625515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The contribution of maternal characteristics and cesarean delivery to an increasing trend of severe maternal morbidity.
    Leonard SA; Main EK; Carmichael SL
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30626349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-Clinical Variables Influencing Cesarean Section Rate According to Robson Classification.
    Strambi N; Sorbi F; Bartolini GM; Forconi C; Sisti G; Seravalli V; Di Tommaso M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Apr; 56(4):. PubMed ID: 32326574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elective cesarean section: why women choose it and what nurses need to know.
    Collard TD; Diallo H; Habinsky A; Hentschell C; Vezeau TM
    Nurs Womens Health; 2008 Dec; 12(6):480-8. PubMed ID: 19121053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rethinking the cesarean rate: how pregnancy complications may affect interhospital comparisons.
    Korst LM; Gornbein JA; Gregory KD
    Med Care; 2005 Mar; 43(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 15725980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Term Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk among Obese Women with and without Comorbidities.
    Glazer KB; Danilack VA; Field AE; Werner EF; Savitz DA
    Am J Perinatol; 2022 Jan; 39(2):154-164. PubMed ID: 32722823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
    Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obstetric complications, neonatal morbidity, and indications for cesarean delivery by maternal age.
    Timofeev J; Reddy UM; Huang CC; Driggers RW; Landy HJ; Laughon SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 122(6):1184-95. PubMed ID: 24201681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.