These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12479611)
1. Children by choice: reproductive technologies and the boundaries of personal autonomy. Charo RA Nat Cell Biol; 2002 Oct; 4 Suppl():s23-8. PubMed ID: 12479611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The constitutional implications of human cloning. Foley EP Ariz Law Rev; 2000; 42(3):647-730. PubMed ID: 15747441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is there a constitutional right to clone? Sunstein CR Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):987-1005. PubMed ID: 15508211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation. Jensen DA J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):619-23. PubMed ID: 18667653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Pennings G Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2689-94. PubMed ID: 15513984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The birds, the bees, and the deep freeze: is there international consensus in the debate over assisted reproductive technologies? Pitrolo EA Houst J Int Law; 1996; 19(1):147-206. PubMed ID: 12666682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What's so strange about human cloning? Rao R Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1007-16. PubMed ID: 15508212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Public health ethics and reproduction]. Alexandrova-Yankulovska S; Bozhinov P; Bojinova S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2014; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24919342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cloning for human reproduction: one American perspective. Chester R Syd Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 23(3):319-46. PubMed ID: 15080116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The politics of bioethics. Cohen E; Kristol W Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cloning from the relational viewpoint]. Tambone V Clin Ter; 2002; 153(6):365-6. PubMed ID: 12645390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal responses to some of the new developments in reproductive technologies. Part 3: the future of reproductive technologies and the law. Scott A Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2002; 8(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 12731561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning. United Nations. General Assembly Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(2):357-8. PubMed ID: 16170888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Loving infertile couple seeks woman age 18-31 to help have baby. $6,500 plus expenses and a gift": should we regulate the use of assisted reproductive technologies by older women? Jayson SA Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2001; 11(2):287-336. PubMed ID: 12611407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A crime against humanity. Trounson A New Sci; 2003 Nov 22-28; 180(2422):23. PubMed ID: 15015506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies? Rasmussen C Sask Law Rev; 2004; 67(1):97-135. PubMed ID: 16485361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assisted reproductive technologies in europe encompass diverse and complex ethical viewpoints: issues to be considered in reporting research in human reproduction. Barlow DH; Beard HK; Williams AC Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Dec; 1034():110-6. PubMed ID: 15731304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act: a chimera of religion and politics. Morris SG Am J Bioeth; 2007 Feb; 7(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 17366203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]