These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12479716)

  • 21. [Initial experience with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography].
    Malíková H; Weichet J; Vymazal J; Balák J; Drugová B; Mares K; Oliverius M
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2003; 142(11):656-60. PubMed ID: 14689824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The usefulness of MRCP in the initial diagnosis of the biliary and pancreatic diseases compared with ERCP].
    Iwano M; Mukai H; Mizuma Y; Takino T; Ashihara T; Ueda T; Matumura S; Fujita T; Takano Y; Fujiwara H; Watanabe A; Masuzawa A
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2880-4. PubMed ID: 9847614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients seen in a referral center for suspected biliary and pancreatic disease.
    Sahai AV; Devonshire D; Yeoh KG; Kay C; Feldman D; Willner I; Farber J; Patel R; Tamasky PR; Cunningham JT; Trus T; Hawes RH; Cotton PB
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jul; 96(7):2074-80. PubMed ID: 11467634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pancreatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging.
    Cem Balci N
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 20(1):1. PubMed ID: 19687719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MR cholangiopancreatography: potential clinical applications.
    Reinbold C; Bret PM; Guibaud L; Barkun AN; Genin G; Atri M
    Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):309-20. PubMed ID: 8966289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.
    Hekimoglu K; Ustundag Y; Dusak A; Erdem Z; Karademir B; Aydemir S; Gundogdu S
    J Dig Dis; 2008 Aug; 9(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 18956595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
    Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
    Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences"--a commentary.
    Soto JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 17579142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Update on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    MacEneaney P; Mitchell MT; McDermott R
    Gastroenterol Clin North Am; 2002 Sep; 31(3):731-46. PubMed ID: 12481728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Shimizu S; Kutsumi H; Fujimoto S; Kawai K
    Endoscopy; 1999 Jan; 31(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10082413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary tract diseases].
    Ito K; Fujita N; Noda Y; Kobayashi G; Kimura K; Tada T; Matsunaga A; Yuki T; Nomura M; Sato T; Ishida K; Uchimi K; Senoo S; Okubo K; Suzuki T; Hirasawa D; Sugawara T; Horaguchi J
    Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Oct; 98(10):1164-73. PubMed ID: 11680990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Digital Evaluation of the Biliopancreatic Tree: Cases From the Pediatric ERCP Database Initiative Consortium.
    Fishman DS; Giefer MJ; Barth B; Troendle DM
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2017 May; 64(5):e125. PubMed ID: 28151768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MR virtual endoscopy of the pancreaticobiliary tract.
    Neri E; Boraschi P; Braccini G; Caramella D; Perri G; Bartolozzi C
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jan; 17(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 9888399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [PSIF/CE-FAST (fast gradient echo) and TSE (turbo spin echo)].
    Miyazaki T; Yamashita Y; Takahashi M
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2773-7. PubMed ID: 9847597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders.
    Halefoglu AM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2007 May; 13(18):2529-34. PubMed ID: 17551999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas and biliary tree.
    Mammone JF; Siegelman ES; Outwater EK
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1998 Feb; 19(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 9503519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic ERCP.
    Ponchon T; Pilleul F
    Endoscopy; 2002 Jan; 34(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 11778128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. MRCP in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease in children.
    Arcement CM; Meza MP; Arumanla S; Towbin RB
    Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Feb; 31(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 11214693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [MR cholangiopancreatography with single-shot fast-spin-echo sequences].
    Shiratori Y; Kanematsu M; Hoshi H; Moriwaki H
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2842-8. PubMed ID: 9847607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
    Vrachliotis TG; Shirkhoda A; Bis KG; Shetty AN; Konez O; Ference JJ; Madrazo BL
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Aug; 38(4):295-323. PubMed ID: 9376087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.