These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12481524)

  • 1. [More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria].
    Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(47):2254-8. PubMed ID: 12481524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Year 2006 update of the Israel National List of Health Services.
    Tamir O; Rabinovich M; Shani M
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Sep; 8(9):595-600. PubMed ID: 17058406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis in relation to budgetary constraints and reallocative restrictions.
    Adang E; Voordijk L; Jan van der Wilt G; Ament A
    Health Policy; 2005 Oct; 74(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 16153475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.
    Williams IP; Bryan S
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2116-29. PubMed ID: 17698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of cost effectiveness in primary health care].
    Busse R; Graf von der Schulenburg JM; Drummond M
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1997 Aug; 91(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 9377699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of health technology assessment in shaping the benefits package in The Netherlands.
    Stolk EA; de Bont A; van Halteren AR; Bijlmer RJ; Poley MJ
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2009 Feb; 9(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19371181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and implementation of health technology assessment in Argentina: two steps forward and one step back.
    Rubinstein A; Pichon-Riviere A; Augustovski F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():260-9. PubMed ID: 19527545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.
    Claxton K; Sculpher M; McCabe C; Briggs A; Akehurst R; Buxton M; Brazier J; O'Hagan T
    Health Econ; 2005 Apr; 14(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 15736142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and regulation of health care technology. The Dutch experience.
    Boer A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(4):638-48. PubMed ID: 10645105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence, appropriateness, and technology assessment in cardiology: a case study of computed tomography.
    Redberg RF
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 17211017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From cost-effectiveness information to decision-making on liquid-based cytology: Mind the gap.
    Legood R; Wolstenholme J; Gray A
    Health Policy; 2009 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18619702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: government agency perspective.
    Taylor R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19 Suppl 2():33-8. PubMed ID: 11700787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Schlander M
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 18591289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria].
    de Winter LJ; Heerema NC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Feb; 147(8):363-4. PubMed ID: 12661124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service?
    Pearson S; Littlejohns P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 17716419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring policy-makers' perspectives on disinvestment from ineffective healthcare practices.
    Elshaug AG; Hiller JE; Moss JR
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18218163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.