These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12481923)

  • 1. Factors affecting private forest landowner interest in ecosystem management: linking spatial and survey data.
    Jacobson MG
    Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 30(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 12481923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical evaluation of private landowner participation in voluntary forest conservation programs.
    Kauneckis D; York AM
    Environ Manage; 2009 Sep; 44(3):468-84. PubMed ID: 19629580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Agent-Based Model of Private Woodland Owner Management Behavior Using Social Interactions, Information Flow, and Peer-To-Peer Networks.
    Huff ES; Leahy JE; Hiebeler D; Weiskittel AR; Noblet CL
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142453. PubMed ID: 26562429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changing landowners, changing ecosystem? Land-ownership motivations as drivers of land management practices.
    Sorice MG; Kreuter UP; Wilcox BP; Fox WE
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 133():144-52. PubMed ID: 24374464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The lay of the land: What we know about non-operating agricultural and absentee forest landowners in the U.S. and Europe.
    Fairchild E; Ulrich-Schad JD; Petrzelka P; Ma Z
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114991. PubMed ID: 35367676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-boundary cooperation in a watershed context: the sentiments of private forest landowners.
    Rickenbach MG; Reed AS
    Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 30(4):584-94. PubMed ID: 12481924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes.
    Lepczyk CA; Mertig AG; Liu J
    Environ Manage; 2004 Jan; 33(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 14749899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contributions of private landowners to the conservation of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus).
    Underwood VJ; Ober HK; Miller DL; Munn IA
    Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 49(4):846-54. PubMed ID: 22371129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appreciation, use, and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in California's working landscapes.
    Plieninger T; Ferranto S; Huntsinger L; Kelly M; Getz C
    Environ Manage; 2012 Sep; 50(3):427-40. PubMed ID: 22767213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of preference heterogeneity among landowners on spatial conservation prioritization.
    Nielsen ASE; Strange N; Bruun HH; Jacobsen JB
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 27995662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
    Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk and cooperation: managing hazardous fuel in mixed ownership landscapes.
    Fischer AP; Charnley S
    Environ Manage; 2012 Jun; 49(6):1192-207. PubMed ID: 22525987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oak conservation and restoration on private forestlands: negotiating a social-ecological landscape.
    Knoot TG; Schulte LA; Rickenbach M
    Environ Manage; 2010 Jan; 45(1):155-64. PubMed ID: 19956949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collateral biodiversity benefits associated with 'free-market' approaches to sustainable land use and forestry activities.
    Koziell I; Swingland IR
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1807-16. PubMed ID: 12460499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landowner response to wildfire risk: Adaptation, mitigation or doing nothing.
    Gan J; Jarrett A; Gaither CJ
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 159():186-191. PubMed ID: 26074470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
    Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.