These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12482113)

  • 1. Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
    Wilson JT; Edwards P; Fiddes H; Stewart E; Teasdale GM
    J Neurotrauma; 2002 Sep; 19(9):999-1005. PubMed ID: 12482113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from in-person and telephone structured interviews.
    Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2003; 18(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 12802167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [French version of structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines and first studies of validation].
    Fayol P; Carrière H; Habonimana D; Preux PM; Dumond JJ
    Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2004 May; 47(4):142-56. PubMed ID: 15130712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of a telephone-based Glasgow Outcome Scale assessment using a structured interview in a heterogenous population of patients and examiners.
    LeGrand SA; Hindman BJ; Dexter F; Moss LG; Todd MM
    J Neurotrauma; 2007 Sep; 24(9):1437-46. PubMed ID: 17892406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use.
    Wilson JT; Pettigrew LE; Teasdale GM
    J Neurotrauma; 1998 Aug; 15(8):573-85. PubMed ID: 9726257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the glasgow outcome scale.
    Wilson JT; Pettigrew LE; Teasdale GM
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Aug; 69(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 10896694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Questionnaires vs Interviews for the Assessment of Global Functional Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Horton L; Rhodes J; Menon DK; Maas AIR; Wilson L;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2134121. PubMed ID: 34762111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relation between Glasgow outcome score extended (GOSE) and the EQ-5D health status questionnaire after head injury.
    Townend W
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2001 Feb; 70(2):267-8. PubMed ID: 11271169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury.
    Levin HS; Boake C; Song J; Mccauley S; Contant C; Diaz-Marchan P; Brundage S; Goodman H; Kotrla KJ
    J Neurotrauma; 2001 Jun; 18(6):575-84. PubMed ID: 11437080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.
    Holm I; Friis A; Storheim K; Brox JI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 12698128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
    Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Teasdale GM
    J Neurosurg; 1998 Dec; 89(6):939-43. PubMed ID: 9833819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
    Kjeken I; Dagfinrud H; Uhlig T; Mowinckel P; Kvien TK; Finset A
    J Rheumatol; 2005 Aug; 32(8):1503-9. PubMed ID: 16078326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing the responsiveness of functional outcome assessment measures for trauma registries.
    Williamson OD; Gabbe BJ; Sutherland AM; Wolfe R; Forbes AB; Cameron PA
    J Trauma; 2011 Jul; 71(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21427612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS. The American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group.
    Choi SC; Marmarou A; Bullock R; Nichols JS; Wei X; Pitts LH
    J Neurotrauma; 1998 Oct; 15(10):771-6. PubMed ID: 9814633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence.
    Kwon S; Visco AG; Fitzgerald MP; Ye W; Whitehead WE;
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Feb; 48(2):323-31; discussion 331-4. PubMed ID: 15616750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health-related quality of life after mild, moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: patterns and predictors of suboptimal functioning during the first year after injury.
    Scholten AC; Haagsma JA; Andriessen TM; Vos PE; Steyerberg EW; van Beeck EF; Polinder S
    Injury; 2015 Apr; 46(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 25476014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between S100B protein serum levels, injury severity and Glasgow Outcome Scale values in children with CNS injuries.
    Homolkova H; Prchlik M; Tomek P
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2012; 33(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 22592203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Manual for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Interview.
    Wilson L; Boase K; Nelson LD; Temkin NR; Giacino JT; Markowitz AJ; Maas A; Menon DK; Teasdale G; Manley GT
    J Neurotrauma; 2021 Sep; 38(17):2435-2446. PubMed ID: 33740873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Glasgow Outcome Scale - 40 years of application and refinement.
    McMillan T; Wilson L; Ponsford J; Levin H; Teasdale G; Bond M
    Nat Rev Neurol; 2016 Aug; 12(8):477-85. PubMed ID: 27418377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
    Teasdale GM; Pettigrew LE; Wilson JT; Murray G; Jennett B
    J Neurotrauma; 1998 Aug; 15(8):587-97. PubMed ID: 9726258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.