198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12483409)
1. Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans.
Freedman NM; Sundaram SK; Kurdziel K; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Carson JM; Sellers D; Libutti SK; Yang JC; Bacharach SL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12483409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simplified kinetic analysis of tumor 18F-FDG uptake: a dynamic approach.
Sundaram SK; Freedman NM; Carrasquillo JA; Carson JM; Whatley M; Libutti SK; Sellers D; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2004 Aug; 45(8):1328-33. PubMed ID: 15299057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of the normal adrenal gland with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Bagheri B; Maurer AH; Cone L; Doss M; Adler L
J Nucl Med; 2004 Aug; 45(8):1340-3. PubMed ID: 15299059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different quantitative approaches to 18F-fluoride PET scans.
Brenner W; Vernon C; Muzi M; Mankoff DA; Link JM; Conrad EU; Eary JF
J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1493-500. PubMed ID: 15347716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generation of parametric K
Wu J; Liu H; Ye Q; Gallezot JD; Naganawa M; Miao T; Lu Y; Chen MK; Esserman DA; Kyriakides TC; Carson RE; Liu C
Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5219-5231. PubMed ID: 34287939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic and static approaches to quantifying 18F-FDG uptake for measuring cancer response to therapy, including the effect of granulocyte CSF.
Doot RK; Dunnwald LK; Schubert EK; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Kinahan PE; Kurland BF; Mankoff DA
J Nucl Med; 2007 Jun; 48(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 17504870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET.
Stahl A; Ott K; Schwaiger M; Weber WA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1471-8. PubMed ID: 15257418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring [(18)F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy: comparison of analytical methods.
Krak NC; van der Hoeven JJ; Hoekstra OS; Twisk JW; van der Wall E; Lammertsma AA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 May; 30(5):674-81. PubMed ID: 12640556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography for evaluation of indeterminate lung nodules: assigning a probability of malignancy may be preferable to binary readings.
Kim SC; Machac J; Krynyckyi BR; Knesaurek K; Krellenstein D; Schultz B; Gribetz A; DePalo L; Teirstein A; Kim CK
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 22(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 18498030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Searching for alternatives to full kinetic analysis in 18F-FDG PET: an extension of the simplified kinetic analysis method.
Hapdey S; Buvat I; Carson JM; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 21421718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET.
Hickeson M; Yun M; Matthies A; Zhuang H; Adam LE; Lacorte L; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Dec; 29(12):1639-47. PubMed ID: 12458399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of regional myocardial uptake in patients without heart disease under fasting conditions on repeated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Inglese E; Leva L; Matheoud R; Sacchetti G; Secco C; Gandolfo P; Brambilla M; Sambuceti G
J Nucl Med; 2007 Oct; 48(10):1662-9. PubMed ID: 17873124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.
Kurland BF; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Doot RK; Wangerin KA; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 26493206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. FDG-PET for prediction of tumour aggressiveness and response to intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.
Kitagawa Y; Sano K; Nishizawa S; Nakamura M; Ogasawara T; Sadato N; Yonekura Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12483411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences.
Beaulieu S; Kinahan P; Tseng J; Dunnwald LK; Schubert EK; Pham P; Lewellen B; Mankoff DA
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 44(7):1044-50. PubMed ID: 12843218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues.
Paquet N; Albert A; Foidart J; Hustinx R
J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 15136627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements between dedicated workstations and a PACS-integrated workstation system.
Meirelles GS; Kijewski P; Akhurst T
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 16972011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
