These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12483768)

  • 1. Simplifying a prognostic model: a simulation study based on clinical data.
    Ambler G; Brady AR; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3803-22. PubMed ID: 12483768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An empirical approach to model selection through validation for censored survival data.
    Choi I; Wells BJ; Yu C; Kattan MW
    J Biomed Inform; 2011 Aug; 44(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 21335102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction and validation of a prognostic model across several studies, with an application in superficial bladder cancer.
    Royston P; Parmar MK; Sylvester R
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):907-26. PubMed ID: 15027080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
    Gui J; Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model selection for multi-component frailty models.
    Ha ID; Lee Y; MacKenzie G
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(26):4790-807. PubMed ID: 17476647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum likelihood estimation in dynamical models of HIV.
    Guedj J; Thiébaut R; Commenges D
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1198-206. PubMed ID: 17489970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up.
    Di Saverio S; Catena F; Santini D; Ansaloni L; Fogacci T; Mignani S; Leone A; Gazzotti F; Gagliardi S; De Cataldis A; Taffurelli M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jun; 109(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 17687650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Erosion of regression effect in a survival study.
    O'Quigley J; Natarajan L
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):344-51. PubMed ID: 15180659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An empirical Bayes method for estimating epistatic effects of quantitative trait loci.
    Xu S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 17688503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-to-event analysis with artificial neural networks: an integrated analytical and rule-based study for breast cancer.
    Lisboa PJ; Etchells TA; Jarman IH; Hane Aung MS; Chabaud S; Bachelot T; Perol D; Gargi T; Bourdès V; Bonnevay S; Négrier S
    Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):414-26. PubMed ID: 18304780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Cox's and relative survival models when estimating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-specific mortality: a simulation study under proportional excess hazards.
    Le Teuff G; Abrahamowicz M; Bolard P; Quantin C
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3887-909. PubMed ID: 16320267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic index score and clinical prediction model of local regional recurrence after mastectomy in breast cancer patients.
    Cheng SH; Horng CF; Clarke JL; Tsou MH; Tsai SY; Chen CM; Jian JJ; Liu MC; West M; Huang AT; Prosnitz LR
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Apr; 64(5):1401-9. PubMed ID: 16472935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case-sibling gene-association studies for diseases with variable age at onset.
    Kraft P; Thomas DC
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3697-712. PubMed ID: 15534888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data.
    Royston P; Sauerbrei W
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(5):723-48. PubMed ID: 14981672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of survival following open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Matsumura JS; Katzen BT; Sullivan TM; Dake MD; Naftel DC;
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2009 Mar; 23(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 18774682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable selection for proportional odds model.
    Lu W; Zhang HH
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(20):3771-81. PubMed ID: 17266170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted lasso in graphical Gaussian modeling for large gene network estimation based on microarray data.
    Shimamura T; Imoto S; Yamaguchi R; Miyano S
    Genome Inform; 2007; 19():142-53. PubMed ID: 18546512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extended information criterion (EIC) approach for linear mixed effects models under restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation.
    Yafune A; Funatogawa T; Ishiguro M
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3417-29. PubMed ID: 16237658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a web-based system for survival estimation in breast cancer.
    Lundin J; Lundin M; Isola J; Joensuu H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():788-93. PubMed ID: 14664084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.