These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12483789)

  • 21. The Use of Restorative Materials in Primary Molars among Pediatric Dentists in Israel.
    Blumer S; Peretz B; Ratson T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 28937890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
    Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Donly KJ; Cervantes M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
    Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for primary teeth.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Shaw L; Hosey MT; Macpherson L; Delargy S; Dopheide B
    Br Dent J; 2005 Sep; 199(6):365-9; discussion 353; quiz 372. PubMed ID: 16184117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Restorative materials in the primary dentition of poli-caries patients.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2007 Mar; 8(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 17394888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Sep; 62(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28437002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
    Vaikuntam J
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical performance of aesthetic restorative materials in primary teeth according to the FDI criteria.
    Bektas Donmez S; Uysal S; Dolgun A; Turgut MD
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):202-212. PubMed ID: 27759409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Nascimento MM; Gordan VV; Qvist V; Bader JD; Rindal DB; Williams OD; Gewartowski D; Fellows JL; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Dec; 142(12):1368-75. PubMed ID: 22130438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars.
    Gross LC; Griffen AL; Casamassimo PS
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11242726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice.
    Smales RJ; Ng KK
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 15762341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Post-Amalgam Era: Norwegian Dentists' Experiences with Composite Resins and Repair of Defective Amalgam Restorations.
    Kopperud SE; Staxrud F; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Apr; 13(4):441. PubMed ID: 27110804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Teaching approaches in South African dental schools: direct restorative procedures.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG; Gugushe TS
    SADJ; 2009 Feb; 64(1):16, 18-20. PubMed ID: 19418898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden.
    Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 9083577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Apr; 112(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15056118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Swedish dentists' decisions on preparation techniques and restorative materials.
    Sundberg H; Mejàre I; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2000 Jun; 58(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 10933563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.