These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12483789)

  • 41. Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Randall RC; Meyers IA; Pitt J; Hall AC
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Dec; 49(4):185-91. PubMed ID: 15762339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Vital pulpotomy in the primary dentition: attitudes and practices of community dental staff in Wales.
    Hingston EJ; Parmar S; Hunter ML
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2007 May; 17(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17397462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth.
    Mjör IA; Dahl JE; Moorhead JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Jan; 60(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 11902609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Restoration of primary molars using a new "compomer" material.
    Swift EJ; Vann WF
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 7(8):25-30; quiz 32. PubMed ID: 9002898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical Evaluation of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth Class II Lesions.
    Sengul F; Gurbuz T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 26161601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth.
    Gilmour AS; Evans P; Addy LD
    Br Dent J; 2007 May; 202(12):E32. PubMed ID: 17510663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; Folkesson UH; van Dijken JW
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Aug; 55(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 9298168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Class V restorations utilizing a new compomer material: a case presentation.
    Denehy GE; Vargas M
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 8(3):269-75; quiz 277. PubMed ID: 9028280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Trends in the selection of dental filling materials.
    Van Meerbeek B; Vanherle G; Lesaffre E; Braem M; Lambrechts P
    J Dent; 1991 Aug; 19(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 1787208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: 2. Glass ionomer derivatives and compomers.
    Burke FJ; Fleming GJ; Owen FJ; Watson DJ
    Dent Update; 2002; 29(1):10-4, 16-7. PubMed ID: 11890017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study.
    Priyank H; Verma A; Gupta K; Chaudhary E; Khandelwal D; Nihalani S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1022-1026. PubMed ID: 27965491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jan; 127(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 8568086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11258095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.