These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12484099)

  • 1. Supreme court rules on student drug testing.
    Meier E
    Nasnewsletter; 2002 Nov; 17(6):14. PubMed ID: 12484099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Under the influence?
    Nursing; 2000 Nov; 30(11):77. PubMed ID: 11111663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Drug testing of students: a legal and public health perspective.
    Einesman F; Taras H
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2007; 23(2):231-71. PubMed ID: 17642382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnant drug abusers are treated like criminals or not treated at all: a third option proposed.
    Kimbel AS
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 21(1):36-66. PubMed ID: 15799534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children are Crying and Dying while the Supreme Court is hiding: Why Public Schools Should Have Broad Authority to Regulate Off-Campus Bullying "Speech.".
    Butwin J
    Fordham Law Rev; 2018 Nov; 87(2):671-701. PubMed ID: 30398321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What are the odds? Random drug testing of students: a legal perspective.
    Roach CA
    J Sch Nurs; 2005 Jun; 21(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15898854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drug testing in the workplace: an update.
    Hosp Secur Saf Manage; 1989 Oct; 10(6):5-11. PubMed ID: 10296530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolving constitutional privacy doctrines affecting healthcare enterprises.
    Krulwich AS; McDonald BL
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 2000; 55(4):491-516. PubMed ID: 16493801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Courts settle difficult questions regarding workplace drug testing.
    Porro J
    Occup Health Saf; 1989 Nov; 58(12):48, 50. PubMed ID: 2594303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
    Weyrauch S
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technologic cornucopias, the Bill of Rights, and slippery slopes.
    Louria DB
    N J Med; 1993 Jan; 90(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 8419856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal-Fetal Rights and Substance Abuse: Gestation Without Representation.
    Boudreaux JM; Thompson JW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Jun; 43(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 26071501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The U.S. Supreme Court on victimized children: the constitutional rights of the defendant versus the best interests of the child.
    Kermani EJ
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1991 Sep; 30(5):839-41. PubMed ID: 1938804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When nurses participate in blood draws for DUI purposes.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Sep; 42(4):1. PubMed ID: 11998478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing health care workers for drugs: developing and implementing a program.
    Kizziar JH; Nichols RS
    Perspect Healthc Risk Manage; 1991; 11(3):18-23. PubMed ID: 10170771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rights of pregnant women: the Supreme Court and drug testing.
    Gostin LO
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 12974111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drugs test cop-out?
    Weeks S; Flatt S; Singleton C
    Nurs Stand; 1999 Jun 23-29; 13(40):22-3. PubMed ID: 10497502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urine screening: what does it mean?
    McMillan DE
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1989; 95():206-10. PubMed ID: 2640965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bloodborne infections: should they be disclosed? Is differential treatment necessary?
    Kukka C
    J Sch Nurs; 2004 Dec; 20(6):324-30. PubMed ID: 15560729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mandatory HIV testing: an Orwellian proposition.
    Lagitch KE
    St Johns Law Rev; 1998; 72(1):103-39. PubMed ID: 16184658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.