These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12484099)

  • 21. Disciplining children with disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
    Ramsingh OM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1995; 12(1):155-81. PubMed ID: 8907110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NCAA institutionally based drug testing: do our athletes know the rules of this game?
    Albrecht RR; Anderson WA; McGrew CA; McKeag DB; Hough DO
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Feb; 24(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 1549014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Supreme Court takes on issue of school drug testing.
    School Nurse News; 2002 Nov; 19(5):11. PubMed ID: 12440323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evolving legal context for drug testing programs.
    Scott M; Fisher KS
    Anesthesiology; 1990 Nov; 73(5):1022-7. PubMed ID: 2240653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Individual freedoms and employer policies and benefit practices.
    Laarman LM
    Employ Relat Today; 1992; 19(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 10121792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Arizona at the center of the U.S. immigration debate: U.S. supreme court rules on controversial state immigration law S.B. 1070.
    Little AS
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Nov; 78(5):383-4. PubMed ID: 22960158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan: the Supreme Court rules on female-only nursing school.
    Greenlaw J
    Law Med Health Care; 1982 Dec; 10(6):267-9. PubMed ID: 6925699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. To test or not to test? Social welfare versus worker freedom.
    Baumrin BH
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 1990; 22(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 2096193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The vulnerability of HIPAA regulations to First and Fourth Amendment attack: an addendum to "Evolving Constitutional Privacy Doctrines Affecting Healthcare Enterprises".
    Krulwich AS; McDonald BL
    Food Drug Law J; 2001; 56(3):281-303. PubMed ID: 11944640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Historical, ethical, and legal issues in mandatory drug testing.
    Giannini AJ; Giannini JN
    JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 2000 Dec; 2(4):105-7, 111. PubMed ID: 11799872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supreme Court to rule on rights of people with disabilities.
    Gold S
    Caring; 1999 Jul; 18(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 10539554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: what does it mean for the students in our care!
    Jannone LT
    NASN Sch Nurse; 2011 May; 26(3):141-2. PubMed ID: 21675292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Criticisms of SATURN mirror criticisms of any mandatory student drug-testing policy.
    Verma AC
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 15035951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Drug testing in Australian schools: policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures.
    Roche AM; Bywood P; Pidd K; Freeman T; Steenson T
    Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Nov; 20(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 19447026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Testing athletes, and banning those who take drugs, is unjustifiable.
    Shuster S
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e3521. PubMed ID: 22619216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Warning! The United States Supreme Court has replaced your whistle with a gag.
    Giordano BP
    AORN J; 1994 Sep; 60(3):360-3. PubMed ID: 7979322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Legal issues related to dismissing students for clinical deficiencies.
    Smith MH; McKoy YD; Richardson J
    Nurse Educ; 2001; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 16372453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: the laws and their impact on students with HIV infection/AIDS entering postsecondary education.
    Pediatr AIDS HIV Infect; 1996 Apr; 7(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 11361483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Refusal of urinary or salivary drug screening at school: the position of the SSAM (Swiss Society of Addiction Medicine)].
    Comité de la Société suisse de médecine de I'addiction
    Rev Med Suisse; 2008 May; 4(156):1172-4. PubMed ID: 18630173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Testing for drugs of abuse in children and adolescents: addendum--testing in schools and at home.
    ; ; Knight JR; Mears CJ
    Pediatrics; 2007 Mar; 119(3):627-30. PubMed ID: 17332219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.