138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12485253)
21. Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Prativadi R; Dahiya N; Kamaya A; Bhatt S
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2017 Oct; 38(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 29031367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Distribution of intranodal vessels in differentiating benign from metastatic neck nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SS; Metreweli C
Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 11247696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Power Doppler sonography of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer.
Ariji Y; Kimura Y; Hayashi N; Onitsuka T; Yonetsu K; Hayashi K; Ariji E; Kobayashi T; Nakamura T
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Feb; 19(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 9504483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the sonographic features of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck malignancy.
Imani Moghaddam M; Davachi B; Mostaan LV; Langaroodi AJ; Memar B; Azimi SA; Marouzi P
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2179-84. PubMed ID: 22075819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
Carlson ER; Schaefferkoetter J; Townsend D; McCoy JM; Campbell PD; Long M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 71(1):162-77. PubMed ID: 22742956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis.
Choi MY; Lee JW; Jang KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):981-4. PubMed ID: 7677005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Shear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography.
Desmots F; Fakhry N; Mancini J; Reyre A; Vidal V; Jacquier A; Santini L; Moulin G; Varoquaux A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 26617244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in cervical lymphadenopathy: A retrospective study of 6,695 cases.
Han F; Xu M; Xie T; Wang JW; Lin QG; Guo ZX; Zheng W; Han J; Lin X; Zou RH; Zhou JH; Li AH
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1809-1817. PubMed ID: 29188372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multivariate feature analysis of sonographic findings of metastatic cervical lymph nodes: contribution of blood flow features revealed by power Doppler sonography for predicting metastasis.
Chikui T; Yonetsu K; Nakamura T
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2000 Mar; 21(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 10730652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Ahuja A; Brook F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 15121245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrasonography of abnormal neck lymph nodes.
Chan JM; Shin LK; Jeffrey RB
Ultrasound Q; 2007 Mar; 23(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17558229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of color Doppler ultrasound in evaluating the status of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancer.
Dangore-Khasbage S; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Banode PJ; Bhake A; Choudhary MS; Lohe VK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 19272807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?
Haberal I; Celik H; Göçmen H; Akmansu H; Yörük M; Ozeri C
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Feb; 130(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 14990916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differential diagnosis of lymph node lesions. A semiquantitative approach with power Doppler sonography.
Steinkamp HJ; Teichgräber UK; Mueffelmann M; Hosten N; Kenzel P; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 1999 Aug; 34(8):509-15. PubMed ID: 10434182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes.
Ahuja A; Ying M
Clin Radiol; 2003 May; 58(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12727163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ultrasonographic evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancers].
Mikami Y; Kamata S; Kawabata K; Nigauri T; Hoki K; Mitani H; Beppu T
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2000 Jul; 103(7):812-20. PubMed ID: 10946554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Imaging of lymph nodes in the neck.
van den Brekel MW; Castelijns JA
Semin Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 35(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 10670052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultrasonographic differentiation of benign from malignant neck lymphadenopathy in thyroid cancer.
Kuna SK; Bracic I; Tesic V; Kuna K; Herceg GH; Dodig D
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Dec; 25(12):1531-7; quiz 1538-40. PubMed ID: 17121947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A practical approach to ultrasound of cervical lymph nodes.
Ahuja A; Ying M; King W; Metreweli C
J Laryngol Otol; 1997 Mar; 111(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 9156061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Small atypical cervical nodes detected on sonography in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: probability of metastasis.
Kim HC; Yoon DY; Chang SK; Han H; Oh SJ; Kim JH; Rho YS; Ahn HY; Kim KH; Shin YC
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Apr; 29(4):531-7. PubMed ID: 20375372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
