BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12486723)

  • 61. Accurate contact predictions using covariation techniques and machine learning.
    Kosciolek T; Jones DT
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):145-51. PubMed ID: 26205532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Using neural networks for prediction of subcellular location of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins.
    Cai YD; Chou KC
    Mol Cell Biol Res Commun; 2000 Sep; 4(3):172-3. PubMed ID: 11281732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Prediction of protein beta-residue contacts by Markov logic networks with grounding-specific weights.
    Lippi M; Frasconi P
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 25(18):2326-33. PubMed ID: 19592394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Prediction of 8-state protein secondary structures by a novel deep learning architecture.
    Zhang B; Li J; Lü Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):293. PubMed ID: 30075707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. MESSM: a framework for protein fold recognition using neural networks and support vector machines.
    Jiang N; Wu W; Mitchell I
    Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2006; 2(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 18048179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A novel model-based on FCM-LM algorithm for prediction of protein folding rate.
    Liu L; Ma M; Cui J
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 15(4):1750012. PubMed ID: 28513252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Predicting protein folding rate from amino acid sequence.
    Guo J; Rao N
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2011 Feb; 9(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21328704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Decoy Database Improvement for Protein Folding.
    Yeh HY; Lindsey A; Wu CP; Thomas S; Amato NM
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):823-36. PubMed ID: 26258648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Neural network prediction of polyproline type II secondary structures.
    Siermala M; Juhola M; Vihinen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():475-9. PubMed ID: 11187597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Computational design of intermolecular stability and specificity in protein self-assembly.
    Nanda V; Zahid S; Xu F; Levine D
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 487():575-93. PubMed ID: 21187239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Fields.
    Wang S; Peng J; Ma J; Xu J
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():18962. PubMed ID: 26752681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evidence theoretic protein fold classification based on the concept of hyperfold.
    Kavousi K; Sadeghi M; Moshiri B; Araabi BN; Moosavi-Movahedi AA
    Math Biosci; 2012 Dec; 240(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 22824139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Novel two-stage hybrid neural discriminant model for predicting proteins structural classes.
    Jahandideh S; Abdolmaleki P; Jahandideh M; Asadabadi EB
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Jun; 128(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 17467878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Knowledge base and neural network approach for protein secondary structure prediction.
    Patel MS; Mazumdar HS
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 361():182-9. PubMed ID: 25128736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Discriminating lysosomal membrane protein types using dynamic neural network.
    Tripathi V; Gupta DK
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2014; 32(10):1575-82. PubMed ID: 23968467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Protein secondary structure prediction: A survey of the state of the art.
    Jiang Q; Jin X; Lee SJ; Yao S
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Sep; 76():379-402. PubMed ID: 28763690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. A computational approach for the identification of small GTPases based on preprocessed amino acid sequences.
    Heider D; Appelmann J; Bayro T; Dreckmann W; Held A; Winkler J; Barnekow A; Borschbach M
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Oct; 8(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 19754209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Natively unstructured loops differ from other loops.
    Schlessinger A; Liu J; Rost B
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Jul; 3(7):e140. PubMed ID: 17658943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Pretty good guessing: protein structure prediction at CASP5.
    Swanson R; Tsai J
    J Bacteriol; 2003 Jul; 185(14):3990-3. PubMed ID: 12837771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Characterization and comparison of protein structures. Part I-characterization.
    Chechetkin VR; Lobzin VV
    J Theor Biol; 1999 May; 198(2):197-218. PubMed ID: 10339394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.