These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1248728)

  • 1. [Do cytological criteria exist to determine the correct technique of a cytosmear of the uterine cervix? (author's transl)].
    Soost HJ; Kattner W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jan; 36(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 1248728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Negative smear in cervical carcinoma in situ (author's transl)].
    Naujoks H; Leppien G; Rogosaroff-Fricke R
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Jul; 36(7):570-5. PubMed ID: 955363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the quality assessment of cervical smears.
    Klinkhamer PJ; Vooijs GP; de Haan AF
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 2929223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Results of cytological routine checks (author's transl)].
    Scholz A
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1979; 101(15):958-61. PubMed ID: 532421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush.
    Lo L; Jordan J
    Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hyperchromatic crowded groups: pitfalls in pap smear diagnosis.
    Demay RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S36-43. PubMed ID: 11996167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cytologic features of squamous cell carcinoma in situ involving endocervical glands in endocervical cytobrush specimens.
    Selvaggi SM
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(5):687-92. PubMed ID: 8091898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix.
    Berner A; Høeg K; Oppedal BR
    Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1980; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7439010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
    Bayrle W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cytologic follow-up examination of patients with a suspicious Papanicoaou type 3D smear (author's transl)].
    Rummel HH; Fick R; Heberling D; Schubert D
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Jun; 37(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 885324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer.
    Kristensen GB; Skyggebjerg KD; Hølund B; Holm K; Hansen MK
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 1994634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Review of cervical smears in a gynaecologic department after a period of ten years under the consideration of colposcopic findings(author's transl)].
    Michalzik K
    Arch Gynakol; 1975; 218(2):149-68. PubMed ID: 1174025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
    Sherman ME; Kelly D
    Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tubal metaplasia. A frequent potential pitfall in the cytologic diagnosis of endocervical glandular dysplasia on cervical smears.
    Novotny DB; Maygarden SJ; Johnson DE; Frable WJ
    Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1546503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.