BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12487684)

  • 21. [Progress in research on evaluation method of lifting equation of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of USA].
    Cao L; He LH; Wang S
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 28(12):936-9. PubMed ID: 21241613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Baron S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9866167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
    Garg A; Kapellusch JM
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; certification of respiratory devices used to protect workers in hazardous environments--NIOSH. Notice of priorities for rulemaking.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Oct; 62(201):53998-4006. PubMed ID: 10177299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Manual lifting load limit equation for adult Indian women workers based on physiological criteria.
    Maiti R; Ray GG
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jan; 47(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 14660218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Occupational lifting by nursing aides and warehouse workers.
    Ljungberg AS; Kilbom A; Hägg GM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 2924762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Epidemiological and biomechanical evaluation of airline baggage handling.
    Tafazzol A; Aref S; Mardani M; Haddad O; Parnianpour M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 26654282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Workers at risk. What industry and government are doing about the problem.
    Fisher C
    Provider; 1995 Jul; 21(7):52-6, 58, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10172361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding outcome metrics of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Fox RR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E; Jaeger M
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102897. PubMed ID: 31422239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The revised NIOSH lifting guidelines. Application in a hospital setting.
    Steinbrecher SM
    AAOHN J; 1994 Feb; 42(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 8147989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Four assessment tools of ergonomics interventions: case study at an electric utility's warehouse system.
    Marklin RW; Wilzbacher JR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 10635543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristics.
    Barim MS; Sesek RF; Capanoglu MF; Drinkaus P; Schall MC; Gallagher S; Davis GA
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():67-73. PubMed ID: 30487111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation.
    Ahmad S; Muzammil M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Mar; 29(1):358-365. PubMed ID: 35253606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Participatory ergonomic intervention for prevention of low back pain: assembly line redesign case.
    Bernardes JM; Wanderck C; Moro AR
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():5993-8. PubMed ID: 22317739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
    Lu ML; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Davis KG
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Curbing needlestick injuries. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
    J Healthc Prot Manage; 1998-1999 Winter; 15(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 10346265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting the load constant of the revised NIOSH lifting equation based on demographics.
    Ahmad S; Muzammil M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 35758150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical lifting energy consumption in work activities designed by means of the "revised NIOSH lifting equation".
    Ranavolo A; Varrecchia T; Rinaldi M; Silvetti A; Serrao M; Conforto S; Draicchio F
    Ind Health; 2017 Oct; 55(5):444-454. PubMed ID: 28781290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation and quantification of manual materials handling risk factors.
    Sesek R; Gilkey D; Drinkaus P; Bloswick DS; Herron R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2003; 9(3):271-87. PubMed ID: 14577945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.