These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12488088)

  • 1. Crosstalk in surface electromyography of the proximal forearm during gripping tasks.
    Mogk JP; Keir PJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2003 Feb; 13(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12488088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping.
    Mogk JP; Keir PJ
    Ergonomics; 2003 Jul; 46(9):956-75. PubMed ID: 12775491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in muscle geometry during forearm pronation and supination and their relationships to EMG cross-correlation measures.
    Yung M; Wells RP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Jun; 23(3):664-72. PubMed ID: 23369877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating protocols for normalizing forearm electromyograms during power grip.
    Ngo BP; Wells RP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2016 Feb; 26():66-72. PubMed ID: 26589588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crosstalk effect on surface electromyogram of the forearm flexors during a static grip task.
    Kong YK; Hallbeck MS; Jung MC
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Dec; 20(6):1223-9. PubMed ID: 20801672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upper-limb surface electro-myography at maximum supination and pronation torques: the effect of elbow and forearm angle.
    O'Sullivan LW; Gallwey TJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2002 Aug; 12(4):275-85. PubMed ID: 12121684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of wrist orthoses on forearm muscle activity.
    Johansson L; Björing G; Hägg GM
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Mar; 35(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 15105074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of forearm muscle activity during gripping.
    Mogk JP; Keir PJ
    Ergonomics; 2006 Sep; 49(11):1121-30. PubMed ID: 16950725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of grip force, stroke rotation and frequency on discomfort for a torqueing tasks.
    Bano F; Mallick Z; Khan AA
    Work; 2015 Aug; 53(4):691-708. PubMed ID: 26409389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forearm posture and grip effects during push and pull tasks.
    Di Domizio J; Keir PJ
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 20191408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing two methods to record maximal voluntary contractions and different electrode positions in recordings of forearm extensor muscle activity: Refining risk assessments for work-related wrist disorders.
    Dahlqvist C; Nordander C; Granqvist L; Forsman M; Hansson GÅ
    Work; 2018; 59(2):231-242. PubMed ID: 29355119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Placement of forearm surface EMG electrodes in the assessment of hand loading in manual tasks.
    Takala EP; Toivonen R
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(7):1159-66. PubMed ID: 23713662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Muscle activity during maximal isometric forearm rotation using a power grip.
    Bader J; Boland MR; Greybe D; Nitz A; Uhl T; Pienkowski D
    J Biomech; 2018 Feb; 68():24-32. PubMed ID: 29305049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electromyographic activity and strength during maximum isometric pronation and supination efforts in healthy adults.
    Gordon KD; Pardo RD; Johnson JA; King GJ; Miller TA
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jan; 22(1):208-13. PubMed ID: 14656682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-session and inter-day reliability of forearm surface EMG during varying hand grip forces.
    Hashemi Oskouei A; Paulin MG; Carman AB
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Feb; 23(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 22999075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is synergistic organisation of muscle coordination altered in people with lateral epicondylalgia? A case-control study.
    Heales LJ; Hug F; MacDonald DA; Vicenzino B; Hodges PW
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Jun; 35():124-31. PubMed ID: 27179317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp.
    Berguer R; Gerber S; Kilpatrick G; Remler M; Beckley D
    Ergonomics; 1999 Dec; 42(12):1634-45. PubMed ID: 10643405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of handgrip forces using surface EMG of forearm muscles.
    Hoozemans MJ; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 15811606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional differences between anatomical regions of the anconeus muscle in humans.
    Bergin MJ; Vicenzino B; Hodges PW
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Dec; 23(6):1391-7. PubMed ID: 24060388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination of forearm's motions by surface EMG signals using neural network.
    Itakura N; Kinbara Y; Fuwa T; Sakamoto K
    Appl Human Sci; 1996 Nov; 15(6):287-94. PubMed ID: 9008983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.