These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12488178)

  • 41. Abdominal computed tomography in the evaluation of acute and perforated appendicitis in the community setting.
    Huynh V; Lalezarzadeh F; Lawandy S; Wong DT; Joe VC
    Am Surg; 2007 Oct; 73(10):1002-5. PubMed ID: 17983068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Perforation in Patients With Acute Appendicitis.
    Gaskill CE; Simianu VV; Carnell J; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Flum DR; Davidson GH
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2018; 47(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 28162864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.
    Flum DR; Morris A; Koepsell T; Dellinger EP
    JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(14):1748-53. PubMed ID: 11594900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Abdominal CT scanning in reproductive-age women with right lower quadrant abdominal pain: does its use reduce negative appendectomy rates and healthcare costs?
    Morse BC; Roettger RH; Kalbaugh CA; Blackhurst DW; Hines WB
    Am Surg; 2007 Jun; 73(6):580-4; discussion 584. PubMed ID: 17658095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended].
    Bakker OJ; Go PM; Puylaert JB; Kazemier G; Heij HA;
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A303. PubMed ID: 20482926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors.
    Taylor GA; Callahan MJ; Rodriguez D; Smink DS
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Apr; 36(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16463152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans.
    McGory ML; Zingmond DS; Nanayakkara D; Maggard MA; Ko CY
    Am Surg; 2005 Oct; 71(10):803-8. PubMed ID: 16468523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Imaging utilization affects negative appendectomy rates in appendicitis: An ACS-NSQIP study.
    Tseng J; Cohen T; Melo N; Alban RF
    Am J Surg; 2019 Jun; 217(6):1094-1098. PubMed ID: 30635205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How often does computed tomography change the management of acute appendicitis?
    Santos DA; Manunga J; Hohman D; Avik E; Taylor EW
    Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):918-21. PubMed ID: 19886134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Acute appendicitis: clinical outcome in patients with an initial false-positive CT diagnosis.
    Stengel JW; Webb EM; Poder L; Yeh BM; Smith-Bindman R; Coakley FV
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 20505066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
    Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update.
    Fuchs JR; Schlamberg JS; Shortsleeve MJ; Schuler JG
    J Surg Res; 2002 Jul; 106(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 12127818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Appendicitis-the balance between cost effectiveness and safety remains challenging.
    Liese J; Halbinger TM; Ulrich F; Bechstein WO; Strey CW
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2014 Apr; 399(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 24633534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lawrence EM; Pooler BD; Bruce RJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(12):789-96, W-291. PubMed ID: 21690593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis.
    Hershko DD; Sroka G; Bahouth H; Ghersin E; Mahajna A; Krausz MM
    Am Surg; 2002 Nov; 68(11):1003-7. PubMed ID: 12455796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Emergency computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: How effectively we use it?
    Yazıcı P; Öz A; Kartal K; Battal M; Kabul Gürbulak E; Akgün İE; Yetkin SG; Mihmanlı M
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2018 Jul; 24(4):311-315. PubMed ID: 30028487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use and accuracy of computed tomography scan in diagnosing perforated appendicitis.
    Verma R; Grechushkin V; Carter D; Barish M; Pryor A; Telem D
    Am Surg; 2015 Apr; 81(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 25831188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Appendicitis in children--impact of US and CT on the negative appendectomy rate.
    Kaiser S; Mesas-Burgos C; Söderman E; Frenckner B
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2004 Aug; 14(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 15343467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable?
    Jones K; Peña AA; Dunn EL; Nadalo L; Mangram AJ
    Am J Surg; 2004 Dec; 188(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 15619494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning.
    Frei SP; Bond WF; Bazuro RK; Richardson DM; Sierzega GM; Reed JF
    Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Jan; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18082779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.