These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12488650)

  • 21. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
    Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aneroid sphygmomanometers. An assessment of accuracy at a university hospital and clinics.
    Bailey RH; Knaus VL; Bauer JH
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Jul; 151(7):1409-12. PubMed ID: 2064493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical assessment of blood pressure.
    McKay DW; Campbell NR; Parab LS; Chockalingam A; Fodor JG
    J Hum Hypertens; 1990 Dec; 4(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 2096205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 'Legacy publication of a 2009 validation of the Riester Big Ben Square Desk aneroid device for blood pressure measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults (2002)'.
    McNally RJ; Dunkerley J; Holland M; Eatough R; Lacy P; McManus RJ; Chapman N; Chowienczyk PJ; Lewis P; Clark CE; Denver E; Neary A; McDonagh STJ; Sheppard JP;
    Blood Press Monit; 2024 Aug; 29(4):203-206. PubMed ID: 38502042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of mercury and aneroid blood pressure measurements in youth.
    Shah AS; Dolan LM; D'Agostino RB; Standiford D; Davis C; Testaverde L; Pihoker C; Daniels SR; Urbina EM;
    Pediatrics; 2012 May; 129(5):e1205-10. PubMed ID: 22508914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometer blood pressure recording compared with digital and mercury measurements in Brazil.
    Gill G; Ala L; Gurgel R; Cuevas L
    Trop Doct; 2004 Jan; 34(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 14959969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Maxi Stabil 3: validation of an aneroid device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Reinders A; Jones CR; Cuckson AC; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2003 Apr; 8(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 12819560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Home sphygmomanometers: validation versus accuracy.
    Akpolat T; Dilek M; Aydogdu T; Adibelli Z; Erdem DG; Erdem E
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Feb; 14(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19190492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The extent and implications of sphygmomanometer calibration error in primary care.
    Rouse A; Marshall T
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Sep; 15(9):587-91. PubMed ID: 11550103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the Tensioday ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
    Németh Z; Móczár K; Deák G
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Jun; 7(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12131077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of semi-automatic device UA-704 for self-measurement of blood pressure.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Rodionov E
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 16077269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Practice audits: reliability of sphygmomanometers and blood pressure recording bias.
    Ali S; Rouse A
    J Hum Hypertens; 2002 May; 16(5):359-61. PubMed ID: 12082498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Calibration accuracy of hospital-based non-invasive blood pressure measuring devices.
    de Greeff A; Lorde I; Wilton A; Seed P; Coleman AJ; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Jan; 24(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19339994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aneroid Blood Pressure Manometer Calibration Rates of Devices Used in Home Health.
    Arena SK; Bacyinski A; Simon L; Peterson EL
    Home Healthc Now; 2016 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 26645840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sphygmomanometers in hospital and family practice: problems and recommendations.
    Burke MJ; Towers HM; O'Malley K; Fitzgerald DJ; O'Brien ET
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Aug; 285(6340):469-71. PubMed ID: 6809128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
    J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of prehospital sphygmomanometers.
    Jones JS; Ramsey W; Hetrick T
    J Emerg Med; 1987; 5(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3584914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sphygmomanometers--an audit in general practice.
    Shah NC; Sibbritt DW; Heaney S; Sharples J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 33(11):952-4. PubMed ID: 15584340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.