These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

805 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12488852)

  • 41. Gingival seal of deep Class II direct and indirect composite restorations.
    Kenyon BJ; Frederickson D; Hagge MS
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17380801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Microleakage evaluation of core buildup composite resins with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems.
    Moosavi H; Moazzami SM; Loh S; Salari S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):009-16. PubMed ID: 20228982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements.
    Yoshida K; Tanagawa M; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 25(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9610856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth.
    Terata R; Nakashima K; Kubota M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 11763933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microleakage and marginal gap of adhesive cements for noble alloy full cast crowns.
    Hooshmand T; Mohajerfar M; Keshvad A; Motahhary P
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 21740242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays: an in vivo investigation.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 20830881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Microleakage of inlay ceramic systems luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Uludag B; Yucedag E; Sahin V
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 25264550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.
    Hewlett S; Wadenya RO; Mante FK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010 Mar; 31(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 20344899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations.
    Woody TL; Davis RD
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):175-80. PubMed ID: 1289863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays.
    Fabianelli A; Goracci C; Bertelli E; Monticelli F; Grandini S; Ferrari M
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 15892362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Radiopacity of different resin-based and conventional luting cements compared to human and bovine teeth.
    Pekkan G; Ozcan M
    Dent Mater J; 2012 Feb; 31(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 22277608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals.
    Li XJ; Zhao SJ; Niu LN; Tay FR; Jiao K; Gao Y; Chen JH
    J Dent; 2014 Jan; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24200871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of cement type and water storage time on the push-out bond strength of a glass fiber post.
    Reis KR; Spyrides GM; Oliveira JA; Jnoub AA; Dias KR; Bonfantes G
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 22011889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of instrumentation time on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Yap AU; Yeo EJ; Yap WY; Ong DS; Tan JW
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 12540118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The influence of long term water immersion on shear bond strength of amalgam repaired by resin composite and mediated by adhesives or resin modified glass ionomers.
    Pilo R; Nissan J; Shafir H; Shapira G; Alter E; Brosh T
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40(7):594-602. PubMed ID: 22504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.