BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12488853)

  • 1. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.
    Khraisat A; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):604-10. PubMed ID: 12488853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
    Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Load fatigue performance of two implant-abutment combinations.
    Basten CH; Nicholls JI; Daly CH; Taggart R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 8803348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
    Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
    Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
    Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter.
    Quek CE; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 17190303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.
    Khraisat A; Baqain ZH; Smadi L; Nomura S; Miyakawa O; Elnasser Z
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16774595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
    Strub JR; Gerds T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12737249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resistance of ITI implant connectors to multivectorial fatigue load application.
    Wiskott HW; Pavone AF; Scherrer SS; Renevey RR; Belser UC
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15686095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.