125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12489556)
1. Spare parts for the rich? Everybody seems to have a view on embryo research. But stem cell treatments raise moral dilemmas that few have even started to consider.
Faden R
New Sci; 2002 Oct; 176(2365):27. PubMed ID: 12489556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem cell research: magical promise v. moral peril.
Orr RD; Hook CC
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 189-99. PubMed ID: 12664944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Testimony on embryonic stem cell research.
Doerflinger R
Origins; 2004 Nov; 34(23):367-73. PubMed ID: 15688549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The promise and peril of embryonic stem cell research: a call for vigilant oversight.
Frist B
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 167-76. PubMed ID: 12664942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Navigating the quagmire: the regulation of human embryonic stem cell research.
Jones DG; Towns CR
Hum Reprod; 2006 May; 21(5):1113-6. PubMed ID: 16361280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Embryonic stem-cell research.
Dolan T; Morlino R; Doyle J
Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(5):78-9. PubMed ID: 16862725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal funding of human embryo stem cell research: advocating a broader approach.
Braswell JR
Chic Kent Law Rev; 2003; 78(1):423-43. PubMed ID: 15156895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem cell research: science, ethics and policy.
Daley GQ; Sandel MJ; Moreno JD
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2005; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 15856604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical issues and approaches in stem cell research: from international insights to a proposal.
Vicini A
J Soc Christ Ethics; 2003; 23(1):71-98. PubMed ID: 15856599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stem cells. Restiveness grows at NIH over Bush research restrictions.
Holden C
Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5720):334-5. PubMed ID: 15831721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
Kim S
Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Causative vs. beneficial complicity in the embryonic stem cell debate.
Robertson JA
Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1099-113. PubMed ID: 15868676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics of cloning and human embryo research.
Saran M
Princet J Bioeth; 2002; 5():25-36. PubMed ID: 12755101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Specially respecting the living human embryo by adhering to standard human subject experimentation rules.
Casey SB; Adams NA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):109, 111-41. PubMed ID: 12664939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stem cell research: the failure of bioethics.
Marquis D
Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 16208837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Australian policy debate about human embryonic stem cell research.
Hall W
Health Law Rev; 2003; 12(2):27-33. PubMed ID: 15742498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Promoting life?: Embryonic stem cell research legislation.
Miller JF
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(2):437-79. PubMed ID: 15214335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
Momeyer RW
Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Dipping into Uncle Sam's pockets: federal funding of stem cell research: is it legal?
Goldstein C
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 2002; 11(2-3):229-59. PubMed ID: 15212067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stem cell research: the bigger picture.
Dresser R
Perspect Biol Med; 2005; 48(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 15834191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
