These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12489769)

  • 1. Vertical disparity can alter perceived direction.
    Berends EM; van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
    Perception; 2002; 31(11):1323-33. PubMed ID: 12489769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information.
    Ishii M
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity.
    Ito H
    Vision Res; 2005 Mar; 45(7):931-42. PubMed ID: 15644231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depth aftereffects mediated by vertical disparities: evidence for vertical disparity driven calibration of extraretinal signals during stereopsis.
    Duke PA; Oruç I; Qi H; Backus BT
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):228-41. PubMed ID: 16257031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is vertical disparity used to determine azimuth?
    Banks MS; Backus BT; Banks RS
    Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(7):801-7. PubMed ID: 11927346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception.
    Fukuda K; Kaneko H; Matsumiya K
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seeing motion in depth using inter-ocular velocity differences.
    Fernandez JM; Farell B
    Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2786-98. PubMed ID: 16023695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of vergence change to the measurement of relative disparity.
    Backus BT; Matza-Brown D
    J Vis; 2003 Dec; 3(11):737-50. PubMed ID: 14765957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Schürer M
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does depth perception require vertical-disparity detectors?
    Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(12):1323-55. PubMed ID: 17209738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereoscopic matching and the aperture problem.
    van Dam LC; van Ee R
    Perception; 2004; 33(7):769-87. PubMed ID: 15460506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is adaptation to perceived interocular differences in height explained by vertical fusional eye movements?
    Maier FM; Schaeffel F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):5020-6. PubMed ID: 23833068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flash lag in depth.
    Harris LR; Duke PA; Kopinska A
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2735-42. PubMed ID: 16469350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptation to vertical disparity induced-depth: implications for disparity processing.
    Duke PA; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 12536136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monocular alignment in different depth planes.
    Shimono K; Wade NJ
    Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(9):1127-35. PubMed ID: 11997051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial scaling of the binocular capture effect.
    Raghunandan A; Anderson CS; Saladin JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
    Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing vertical size disparities in distinct depth planes.
    Duke PA; Howard IP
    J Vis; 2012 Aug; 12(8):10. PubMed ID: 22904355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.