These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12490515)

  • 1. Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment.
    Sumkin JH; Klaman HM; Graham M; Ruskauff T; Gennari RC; King JL; Klym AH; Ganott MA; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 12490515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Added Value of Prereading Screening Mammograms for Breast Cancer by Radiologic Technologists on Early Screening Outcomes.
    Geertse TD; Setz-Pels W; van der Waal D; Nederend J; Korte B; Tetteroo E; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJM; Duijm LEM
    Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):276-283. PubMed ID: 34751612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
    Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?
    Henderson LM; Benefield T; Bowling JM; Durham DD; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Yankaskas BC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 25794085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The inter-observer variability of breast density scoring between mammography technologists and breast radiologists and its effect on the rate of adjuvant ultrasound.
    Mazor RD; Savir A; Gheorghiu D; Weinstein Y; Abadi-Korek I; Shabshin N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 27130056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.
    Elmore JG; Wells CK; Lee CH; Howard DH; Feinstein AR
    N Engl J Med; 1994 Dec; 331(22):1493-9. PubMed ID: 7969300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costs and effects of using specialized breast technologists in prereading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 19845980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.
    Henderson LM; Marsh MW; Benefield T; Pearsall E; Durham D; Schroeder BF; Bowling JM; Viglione CA; Yankaskas BC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Dec; 12(12 Pt B):1419-26. PubMed ID: 26614888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.
    Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Cohen CS; Clearfield RJ; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 15766687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program.
    Tonita JM; Hillis JP; Lim CH
    Radiology; 1999 May; 211(2):529-33. PubMed ID: 10228538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods of compliance with Mammography Quality Standards Act regulations for tracking positive mammograms: survey results.
    Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; Brenner RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):691-6. PubMed ID: 10063862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multisite telemammography system for remote management of screening mammography: an assessment of technical, operational, and clinical issues.
    Leader JK; Hakim CM; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Wallace LP; Clearfield RJ; Perrin RL; Drescher JM; Maitz GS; Sumkin JH; Gur D
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 16710798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for breast cancer in women undergoing mammography.
    Reuter KL; Baker SP; Krolikowski FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 1729780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can breast surgeons read mammograms of symptomatic patients in the one-stop breast clinic?
    Rao MC; Griffith CD; Griffiths AB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Mar; 83(2):108-9. PubMed ID: 11320917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.