These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12490638)

  • 1. Objectivity and the neutral expert.
    Parascandola M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2003 Jan; 57(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12490638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objectivity in nursing research: observations and objections.
    Avis M
    Int J Nurs Stud; 1998 Jun; 35(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9789776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergence of "pseudoscience".
    Healey MA
    Can Fam Physician; 1998 Nov; 44():2374-5. PubMed ID: 9839046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Something is better than nothing.
    Roberts S
    Nutrition; 2007; 23(11-12):911-2. PubMed ID: 17900865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misconduct: acceptable practices differ by field.
    Grinnell F
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7052):776. PubMed ID: 16094343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objectivity in psychosocial measurement: what, why, how.
    Fisher WP
    J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(2):527-63. PubMed ID: 11272616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The lack of objectivity of physician evaluations in geriatric guardianship cases.
    Goodenough GK
    J Contemp Law; 1988; 14(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 11650358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Values in design sciences.
    Niiniluoto I
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2014 Jun; 46():11-5. PubMed ID: 25051866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The expert bias].
    Pons JMV
    Med Clin (Barc); 2016 Sep; 147(5):205-206. PubMed ID: 27143529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypothesis testing and anomaly explaining.
    van Andel P
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Jun; 21(2):67-8. PubMed ID: 10994178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facts, values, and expert testimony.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(5):26-8. PubMed ID: 8262766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The "infallibility" of psychopathology.
    Mender D
    Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Aug; 162(8):1551-2; author reply 1552. PubMed ID: 16055794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Rejection of the medical expert because of prejudice].
    Asanger R
    Unfallheilkunde; 1976 May; 79(5):235-6. PubMed ID: 1273993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sci-exit: The Exit of Scientists from Science.
    Dossey L
    Explore (NY); 2019; 15(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 30660505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering.
    Tannenbaum C; Ellis RP; Eyssel F; Zou J; Schiebinger L
    Nature; 2019 Nov; 575(7781):137-146. PubMed ID: 31695204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical testimony without bias.
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1968 Jul; 88(1):98. PubMed ID: 5660034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A little touch of heresy.
    Carney KK
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2011 Dec; 39(12):861-3. PubMed ID: 22409135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The rejection of a medical authority because of prejudice. The decision of the Landgericht Dortmund of 10 September 1992].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1993 Mar; 118(9):315-6. PubMed ID: 8444115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Short quality of life respiratory questionnaires: clinical and scientific issues].
    Ninot G
    Rev Mal Respir; 2012 Mar; 29(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 22440298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Statistical analyses: hypotheses or proof?].
    Girard M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Oct; 33(6 Pt 2):3S27-8. PubMed ID: 15643683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.