212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12493044)
1. Mid-trimester ultrasound prediction of gestational age: advantages and systematic errors.
Källén K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 12493044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates.
Morin I; Morin L; Zhang X; Platt RW; Blondel B; Bréart G; Usher R; Kramer MS
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 15663577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal outcome in pregnancies defined as post-term according to the last menstrual period estimate, but not according to the ultrasound estimate.
Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10461332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
Dietz PM; England LJ; Callaghan WM; Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():62-71. PubMed ID: 17803619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate.
Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10461333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of delivery date by sonography in the first and second trimesters.
Olesen AW; Thomsen SG
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16865679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and fetal factors which affect fetometry: use of in vitro fertilization and birth register data.
Källén B; Finnström O; Nygren KG; Olausson PO
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 23928480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The biologic error in gestational length related to the use of the first day of last menstrual period as a proxy for the start of pregnancy.
Nakling J; Buhaug H; Backe B
Early Hum Dev; 2005 Oct; 81(10):833-9. PubMed ID: 16084037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Last menstrual period provides the best estimate of gestation length for women in rural Guatemala.
Neufeld LM; Haas JD; Grajéda R; Martorell R
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 20(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 16879501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Determination of the expected day of delivery--ultrasound has not been shown to be more accurate than the calendar method].
Olsen O; Clausen JA
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Mar; 160(14):2088-90. PubMed ID: 9604677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records.
Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():50-61. PubMed ID: 17803618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conceptional age, menstrual age, and ultrasound age: a second-trimester comparison of pregnancies of known conception date with pregnancies dated from the last menstrual period.
Rossavik IK; Fishburne JI
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 2643067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of the day of delivery by the use of ultrasound.
Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 11(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 9549835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome.
Oh JS; Wright G; Coulam CB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 12230450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.
Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P; Von Düring V; Kahn JA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10776011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17,450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?
Nguyen TH; Larsen T; Engholm G; Møller H
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 10461334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bedsharing and maternal smoking in a population-based survey of new mothers.
Lahr MB; Rosenberg KD; Lapidus JA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e530-42. PubMed ID: 16199682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
