These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12493046)

  • 1. Measuring cervical length with ultrasound: evaluation of the procedures and duration of a learning method.
    Vayssière C; Morinière C; Camus E; Le Strat Y; Poty L; Fermanian J; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 12493046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
    Valentin L; Bergelin I
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 12230448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.
    Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor.
    Gauthier T; Marin B; Garuchet-Bigot A; Kanoun D; Catalan C; Caly H; Eyraud JL; Aubard Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 24728104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra- and interobserver agreement on cervical volume and flow indices during pregnancy using transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography and Doppler angiography.
    Basgul A; Kavak ZN; Bakirci N; Gokaslan H
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2006; 51(6):256-61. PubMed ID: 17566567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study.
    Bergelin I; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 12808672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length assessment in the second half of pregnancy.
    Brandão RS; Pires CR; de Souza E; Avanza LL; Mattar R; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 20350684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
    Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women.
    Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 26(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 15959922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length?
    Friedman AM; Srinivas SK; Parry S; Elovitz MA; Wang E; Schwartz N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 208(3):190.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23246815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth.
    Berghella V; Roman A; Daskalakis C; Ness A; Baxter JK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):311-7. PubMed ID: 17666605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography.
    Cicero S; Skentou C; Souka A; To MS; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 17(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 11339192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of two methods of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement.
    Farrell T; Cairns M; Leslie J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 12858303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability.
    Burger M; Weber-Rössler T; Willmann M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 9(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 9165682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second trimester cervical length measurements with transvaginal ultrasound: A prospective observational agreement and reliability study.
    Kuusela P; Wennerholm UB; Fadl H; Wesström J; Lindgren P; Hagberg H; Jacobsson B; Valentin L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1476-1485. PubMed ID: 32392356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency of uterine contractions in asymptomatic pregnant women with or without a short cervix on transvaginal ultrasound scan.
    Berghella V; Iams JD; Newman RB; Macpherson C; Goldenberg RL; Mueller-Heubach E; Caritis SN; Dombrowski MP;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1253-6. PubMed ID: 15507949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length before 14 weeks predict preterm delivery in high-risk pregnancies?
    Berghella V; Talucci M; Desai A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 21(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 12601834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of fetal head descent using the 'angle of progression' on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise.
    Dückelmann AM; Bamberg C; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Nonnenmacher A; Dudenhausen JW; Kalache KD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Feb; 35(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 20069668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women.
    Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.