355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12493050)
1. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models.
Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Tailor A; Jurkovic D; Bourne TH; Collins WP; Campbell S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 10(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 9263422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Studies on angiogenesis in the benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms with the use of color and pulsed Doppler sonography and serum CA-125, CA-19.9, CA-72.4 and vascular endothelial growth factor measurements.
Czekierdowski A
Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 12898913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Use of color Doppler technique and estimation of CA 125 amd TPA levels in blood serum for the diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Fuchs T; Michniewicz J; Zimmer M
Ginekol Pol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1038-43. PubMed ID: 12722396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Sonoangiography and logistic regression analysis in the preoperative differentiation of ovarian tumors].
Smoleń A; Czekierdowski A; Daniłoś J; Kraczkowski J
Ginekol Pol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-60. PubMed ID: 12722399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and limitations of ultrasonographic evaluation of uterine adnexal lesions in early detection of ovarian cancer.
Varras M
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2004; 31(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 15266758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Use of multilayer perception artificial neutral networks for the prediction of the probability of malignancy in adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):855-62. PubMed ID: 14674136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis of adnexal malignancies by using color Doppler energy imaging as a secondary test in persistent masses.
Guerriero S; Ajossa S; Risalvato A; Lai MP; Mais V; Angiolucci M; Melis GB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 11(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 9618853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model for malignancy probability prediction of adnexal masses.
Sutantawibul A; Ruangvutilert P; Sunsaneevithayakul P; Boriboonhirunsarn D
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Aug; 86(8):742-9. PubMed ID: 12948273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using a logistic model to predict malignancy of adnexal masses based on menopausal status, ultrasound morphology, and color Doppler findings.
Alcázar JL; Jurado M
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 May; 69(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 9600822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characteristics of ovarian tumors with color Doppler sonography: a comparison of predictive models derived from two academic centers data].
Smoleń A; Szpurek D; Czekierdowski A; Moszyński R
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):863-71. PubMed ID: 14674137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].
Marret H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Nov; 30(1 Suppl):S20-33. PubMed ID: 11917373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Ovarian Tumor Index predicts risk for malignancy.
Twickler DM; Forte TB; Santos-Ramos R; McIntire D; Harris P; Scott D
Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2280-90. PubMed ID: 10590369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colour and pulsed Doppler US and tumour marker CA 125 in differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses.
Antonić J; Rakar S
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(4):1527-32. PubMed ID: 7654041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does sphere volume affect the performance of three-dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic-solid adnexal masses?
Kudla MJ; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20183808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
Timmerman D; Verrelst H; Bourne TH; De Moor B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Vandewalle J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10201082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]