These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12493637)

  • 1. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality.
    Lewis KE; Watterson TL; Houghton SM
    J Commun Disord; 2003; 36(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of nasality ratings between a monolingual and bilingual listener for speech samples from English-Spanish-Speaking children.
    Watterson T; Lewis KE; Murdock T; Cordero KN
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 24157638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
    Sweeney T; Sell D
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: a comparison with speech and language pathologists' ratings.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):656-74. PubMed ID: 18821109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 and perceptual judgments of hypernasality.
    Bettens K; De Bodt M; Maryn Y; Luyten A; Wuyts FL; Van Lierde KM
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 62():67-81. PubMed ID: 27310727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Nasalance" vs. listner judgements of nasality.
    Fletcher SG
    Cleft Palate J; 1976 Jan; 13():31-44. PubMed ID: 1060524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of nasalance and nasality in patients with a repaired cleft palate.
    Sinko K; Gruber M; Jagsch R; Roesner I; Baumann A; Wutzl A; Denk-Linnert DM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 274(7):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 28299425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nasalance and nasality in low pressure and high pressure speech.
    Watterson T; Lewis KE; Deutsch C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jul; 35(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 9684765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual Anchors and the Dispersion of Nasality Ratings.
    Galek KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):423-430. PubMed ID: 27043649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between nasalance scores and nasality ratings obtained with equal appearing interval and direct magnitude estimation scaling methods.
    Brancamp TU; Lewis KE; Watterson T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Nov; 47(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 20500059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
    Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual Assessment of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction by Otolaryngology Residents.
    Butts SC; Truong A; Forde C; Stefanov DG; Marrinan E
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Dec; 155(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27484234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cleft type on overall speech intelligibility and resonance.
    Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Van Borsel J; Wuyts FL; Van Cauwenberge P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 12077507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality compared to HONC measures: the role of experience.
    Laczi E; Sussman JE; Stathopoulos ET; Huber J
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Mar; 42(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15748113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nasalance-Based Preclassification of Oral-Nasal Balance Disorders Results in Higher Agreement of Expert Listeners' Auditory-Perceptual Assessments: Results of a Retrospective Listening Study.
    de Boer G; Marino VCC; Dutka JCR; Pegoraro-Krook MI; Bressmann T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2020 Apr; 57(4):448-457. PubMed ID: 31537110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery.
    Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relation of nasality and nasalance to nasal port area based on a computational model.
    Bunton K; Story BH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Nov; 49(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 21970695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Articulation and nasality changes resulting from sustained palatal fistula obturation.
    Pinborough-Zimmerman J; Canady C; Yamashiro DK; Morales L
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 9482228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of transverse and vertical pharyngeal flaps using electromyography and judgments of nasality.
    Hathaway RR
    Cleft Palate J; 1980 Oct; 17(4):305-8. PubMed ID: 6934046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.