These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12494550)

  • 1. [A new method of testing the effectiveness of sterile packaging in general practice].
    Dunkelberg H; Wedekind S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Nov; 47(11):290-3. PubMed ID: 12494550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary results for a new final package test to assess the quality of sterile package systems.
    Dunkelberg H; Wedekind S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 25(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 14756215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Tests of the microbiologic barrier in sterile packaging].
    Jakimiak B; Röhm-Rodowald E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2002; 53(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 12235676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test to determine sterile integrity of wrapped medical products at a probability of recontamination of 1 : 1,000,000.
    Dunkelberg H; Rohmann S
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 16622814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the efficacy of sterile barrier systems against microbial challenges during transport and storage.
    Dunkelberg H; Schmelz U
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19090770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An international standard for terminally sterilized medical device packaging.
    Donawa ME
    Med Device Technol; 1997; 8(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 10169623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Barrier properties and cost implications of a single versus a double wrap for storing sterile instrument packs.
    Webster J; Radke E; George N; Faoagali J; Harris M
    Am J Infect Control; 2005 Aug; 33(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 16061141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sterility maintenance study: Dynamic evaluation of sterilized rigid containers and wrapped instrument trays to prevent bacterial ingress.
    Shaffer HL; Harnish DA; McDonald M; Vernon RA; Heimbuch BK
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26337855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sterility of packaged implant components.
    Worthington P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):461. PubMed ID: 15973959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Sterile packaging].
    Röhm-Rodowald E; Jakimiak B
    Przegl Epidemiol; 1998; 52(1-2):171-82. PubMed ID: 9738428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of microbiologic contamination on a phosphor plate system: is weekly gas sterilization enough?
    Kalathingal S; Youngpeter A; Minton J; Shrout M; Dickinson D; Plummer K; Looney S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 20060337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viable spore counts in biological controls pre-sterilization.
    Brusca MI; Bernat MI; Turcot L; Nastri N; Nastri M; Rosa A
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 16673791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of delayed microbial analysis of dental unit water line specimens.
    Palenik CJ; Burgess KH; Miller CH
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15973824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro analysis of microbial transmission during EUS-guided FNA and the utility of sterilization agents.
    Sing J; Erickson R; Fader R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Nov; 64(5):774-9. PubMed ID: 17055873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atmospheric contamination during ultrasonic scaling.
    Timmerman MF; Menso L; Steinfort J; van Winkelhoff AJ; van der Weijden GA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 31(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 15142216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing AORN recommended practices for selection and use of packaging systems for sterilization.
    Morton PJ; Conner R
    AORN J; 2014 Apr; 99(4):495-502; quiz 502-5. PubMed ID: 24674795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HACCP and its implications for sterile medical device packaging.
    Pilchik R
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Nov; 12(9):45-7. PubMed ID: 12938540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of the microbial barrier effectiveness of sterilization containers in terms of the log reduction value for prevention of nosocomial infections.
    Dunkelberg H; Fleitmann-Glende F
    Am J Infect Control; 2006 Jun; 34(5):285-9. PubMed ID: 16765207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Sterilization of plastic culture boxes by formaldehyde vapour (author's transl)].
    Smit MP; Scholtens W; Kruger WJ
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1977 Oct; 102(19):1129-37. PubMed ID: 562005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European and US quality system requirements for packaging.
    Donawa ME
    Med Device Technol; 1997 May; 8(4):12-4, 16-7. PubMed ID: 10167684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.