These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12495151)

  • 21. Ranked set sampling for replicated sampling designs.
    Barabesi L; Pisani C
    Biometrics; 2002 Sep; 58(3):586-92. PubMed ID: 12229993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. RSS-Bagging: Improving Generalization Through the Fisher Information of Training Data.
    Wang J; Li F; Li J; Hou C; Qian Y; Liang J
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2023 May; PP():. PubMed ID: 37216237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sensitive proportion in ranked set sampling.
    Abbasi AM; Shad MY
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256699. PubMed ID: 34464414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Information Generating Function of Ranked Set Samples.
    Kharazmi O; Tamandi M; Balakrishnan N
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Oct; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 34828079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interest of a prescreening questionnaire to reduce the cost of bone densitometry.
    Ben Sedrine W; Broers P; Devogelaer JP; Depresseux G; Kaufman JM; Goemaere S; Reginster JY
    Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 12086356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation of ordinal population with multi-observer ranked set samples using ties information.
    Alvandi A; Hatefi A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1960-1975. PubMed ID: 34218747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of the Coefficient of Variation with Minimum Risk: A Sequential Method for Minimizing Sampling Error and Study Cost.
    Chattopadhyay B; Kelley K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):627-648. PubMed ID: 27712116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The New Sub-regression Type Estimator in Ranked Set Sampling.
    Koçyiğit EG; Rather KUI
    J Stat Theory Pract; 2023; 17(2):27. PubMed ID: 36875336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical value of bone densitometry.
    Sartoris DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):133-5. PubMed ID: 8010199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bone mineral density referral for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using quantitative ultrasound as a prescreening tool in postmenopausal women from the general population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Marín F; López-Bastida J; Díez-Pérez A; Sacristán JA;
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Mar; 74(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 14708042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
    Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A systematic approach to designing statistically powerful heteroscedastic 2 × 2 factorial studies while minimizing financial costs.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):114. PubMed ID: 27578357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A method for determining the sampling ratio in epidemiologic studies.
    Morgenstern H; Winn DM
    Stat Med; 1983; 2(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 6417752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On partial randomized response model using ranked set sampling.
    Abbasi AM; Shad MY; Ahmed A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277497. PubMed ID: 36445862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimal sample sizes for Welch's test under various allocation and cost considerations.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21512873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Curvature-adjusted optimal design of sampling times for the inference of pharmacokinetic compartment models.
    Daimon T; Goto M
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(14):2799-812. PubMed ID: 17072822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Including sampling and phenotyping costs into the optimization of two stage designs for genomewide association studies.
    Müller HH; Pahl R; Schäfer H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):844-52. PubMed ID: 17549751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.