These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12495158)

  • 1. Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers.
    Barnhart HX; Haber M; Song J
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12495158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer programs for the concordance correlation coefficient.
    Crawford SB; Kosinski AS; Lin HM; Williamson JM; Barnhart HX
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 17709153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Lokhnygina Y; Kosinski AS; Haber M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):721-38. PubMed ID: 17613650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coefficients of agreement for fixed observers.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2006 Jun; 15(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 16768299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling concordance correlation via GEE to evaluate reproducibility.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):931-40. PubMed ID: 11550947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings.
    Barnhart HX; Song J; Haber MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1371-84. PubMed ID: 15570569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new permutation-based method for assessing agreement between two observers making replicated quantitative readings.
    Pan Y; Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2249-61. PubMed ID: 22415910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing individual agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS; Haber MJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):697-719. PubMed ID: 17613649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resampling dependent concordance correlation coefficients.
    Williamson JM; Crawford SB; Lin HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 17613648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of the concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measures using SAS and R.
    Carrasco JL; Phillips BR; Puig-Martinez J; King TS; Chinchilli VM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Mar; 109(3):293-304. PubMed ID: 23031487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    Tashakor E; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):174-188. PubMed ID: 29953327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concordance correlation coefficients estimated by generalized estimating equations and variance components for longitudinal repeated measurements.
    Tsai MY
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1319-1333. PubMed ID: 28105775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Simple Approach for Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Two Concordance Correlation Coefficients Estimated on the Same Subjects.
    Lin HM; Williamson JM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1145-60. PubMed ID: 25321842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing agreement with repeated measures for random observers.
    Chen CC; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(30):3546-59. PubMed ID: 22095759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis.
    Mitra D; Connolly D; Jenkins S; English P; Birchall D; Mandel C; Shrikanth K; Gregson B; Gholkar A
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):201-7. PubMed ID: 16498031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient estimating approaches with skewed data.
    Carrasco JL; Jover L; King TS; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 17613647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement Analysis: What He Said, She Said Versus You Said.
    Vetter TR; Schober P
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jun; 126(6):2123-2128. PubMed ID: 29677066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components.
    Carrasco JL; Jover L
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):849-58. PubMed ID: 14969463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis.
    Young GR; Humphrey PR; Nixon TE; Smith ET
    Stroke; 1996 Mar; 27(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 8610315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.