These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12496075)

  • 1. Validity of Gō models: comparison with a solvent-shielded empirical energy decomposition.
    Paci E; Vendruscolo M; Karplus M
    Biophys J; 2002 Dec; 83(6):3032-8. PubMed ID: 12496075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of contact matrices induced by pairwise interactions in proteins.
    Miyazawa S; Kinjo AR
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 May; 77(5 Pt 1):051910. PubMed ID: 18643105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.
    Vorobjev YN; Almagro JC; Hermans J
    Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FACTS: Fast analytical continuum treatment of solvation.
    Haberthür U; Caflisch A
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(5):701-15. PubMed ID: 17918282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probing possible downhill folding: native contact topology likely places a significant constraint on the folding cooperativity of proteins with approximately 40 residues.
    Badasyan A; Liu Z; Chan HS
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Dec; 384(2):512-30. PubMed ID: 18823994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Translational-entropy gain of solvent upon protein folding.
    Harano Y; Kinoshita M
    Biophys J; 2005 Oct; 89(4):2701-10. PubMed ID: 16055541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.
    Zhou R
    Proteins; 2003 Nov; 53(2):148-61. PubMed ID: 14517967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hidden structure in protein energy landscapes.
    Ming D; Anghel M; Wall ME
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Feb; 77(2 Pt 1):021902. PubMed ID: 18352046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors governing the foldability of proteins.
    Klimov DK; Thirumalai D
    Proteins; 1996 Dec; 26(4):411-41. PubMed ID: 8990496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lessons from the design of a novel atomic potential for protein folding.
    Chen WW; Shakhnovich EI
    Protein Sci; 2005 Jul; 14(7):1741-52. PubMed ID: 15987903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Native and non-native interactions along protein folding and unfolding pathways.
    Paci E; Vendruscolo M; Karplus M
    Proteins; 2002 May; 47(3):379-92. PubMed ID: 11948791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geometry of the energy landscape and folding transition in a simple model of a protein.
    Mazzoni LN; Casetti L
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 May; 77(5 Pt 1):051917. PubMed ID: 18643112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-state folding, folding through intermediates, and metastability in a minimalistic hydrophobic-polar model for proteins.
    Schnabel S; Bachmann M; Janke W
    Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Jan; 98(4):048103. PubMed ID: 17358817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations.
    Feig M; Brooks CL
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Apr; 14(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 15093837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of chain connectivity on the structure of Lennard-Jones liquid and its implicationon statistical potentials for protein folding.
    Lu WC; Wang CZ; Ho KM
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Jun; 69(6 Pt 1):061920. PubMed ID: 15244630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energetic and structural consequences of desolvation/solvation barriers to protein folding/unfolding assessed from experimental unfolding rates.
    Rodriguez-Larrea D; Ibarra-Molero B; Sanchez-Ruiz JM
    Biophys J; 2006 Sep; 91(5):L48-50. PubMed ID: 16798814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Water promotes the sealing of nanoscale packing defects in folding proteins.
    Fernández A
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2014 May; 26(20):202101. PubMed ID: 24769440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimalist models for protein folding and design.
    Head-Gordon T; Brown S
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2003 Apr; 13(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12727508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A soft, mean-field potential derived from crystal contacts for predicting protein-protein interactions.
    Robert CH; Janin J
    J Mol Biol; 1998 Nov; 283(5):1037-47. PubMed ID: 9799642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.