133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12496692)
21. Robust expression of EZH2 in endocervical neoplastic lesions.
Makk E; Bálint L; Cifra J; Tornóczky T; Oszter A; Tóth A; Kálmán E; Kovács K
Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 30903272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reproducible and clinically meaningful differential diagnosis is possible between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and 'adenoma malignum' based on common histopathological criteria.
Tsuda H; Mikami Y; Kaku T; Hasegawa T; Akiyama F; Ohishi Y; Sasajima Y; Kasamatsu T
Pathol Int; 2005 Jul; 55(7):412-8. PubMed ID: 15982216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Glandular lesions of the uterine cervix: the present state of our knowledge.
Wells M; Brown LJ
Histopathology; 1986 Aug; 10(8):777-92. PubMed ID: 3758950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Human papillomavirus DNA in glandular dysplasia and microglandular hyperplasia: presumed precursors of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Tase T; Okagaki T; Clark BA; Twiggs LB; Ostrow RS; Faras AJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 73(6):1005-8. PubMed ID: 2542853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictive value of diagnoses of endocervical glandular abnormalities in cervical smears.
Segal A; Frost FA; Miranda A; Fletcher C; Sterrett GF
Pathology; 2003 Jun; 35(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 14506961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Individual use of cytomorphologic characteristics in the diagnosis of endocervical columnar cell abnormalities: selection of preferred features with help of the 'Navigator' microscope.
van Aspert van Erp AJ; van't Hof Grootenboer AE; Brugal G; Vooijs GP
Anal Cell Pathol; 1996 Jul; 11(2):73-95. PubMed ID: 8844106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification: Validation and Interobserver Reproducibility.
Hodgson A; Park KJ; Djordjevic B; Howitt BE; Nucci MR; Oliva E; Stolnicu S; Xu B; Soslow RA; Parra-Herran C
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Jan; 43(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 29877920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of histo-pathological diagnosis of squamous epithelial changes of the uterine cervix.
Ringsted J; Amtrup F; Asklund C; Baunsgaard P; Christensen HE; Hansen L; Jakobsen C; Jensen K; Moesner J; Rasmussen J; Reintoft I; Rolschau J; Starklint H; Thommesen N; Vrang J
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A; 1978 Jul; 86(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 716888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endocervical carcinoma: a study of 23 patients with clinical-pathological correlation.
Deligdisch L; Escay-Martinez E; Cohen CJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1984 Jul; 18(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 6086469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Endocervical glandular lesions: a diagnostic approach combining a semi-quantitative scoring method to the expression of CEA, MIB-1 and p16.
Pavlakis K; Messini I; Athanassiadou S; Kyrodimou E; Pandazopoulou A; Vrekoussis T; Stathopoulos EN
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):971-6. PubMed ID: 16876235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical intraepithelial glandular neoplasia diagnosis and significance in relation to squamous precancerous lesions.
Bhambhani S; Kaushik N; Khan IU; Luthram UK
Indian J Cancer; 1990 Dec; 27(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 2090576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical glandular atypia associated with squamous intraepithelial neoplasia: a premalignant lesion?
Brown LJ; Wells M
J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jan; 39(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 3950029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utility of p16INK4a, CEA, Ki67, P53 and ER/PR in the differential diagnosis of benign, premalignant, and malignant glandular lesions of the uterine cervix and their relationship with Silverberg scoring system for endocervical glandular lesions.
Liang J; Mittal KR; Wei JJ; Yee H; Chiriboga L; Shukla P
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2007 Jan; 26(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 17197900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Noninvasive precursor lesions of adenocarcinoma and mixed adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
Christopherson WM; Nealon N; Gray LA
Cancer; 1979 Sep; 44(3):975-83. PubMed ID: 476603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Endocervical carcinoma.
Yeh IT; LiVolsi VA; Noumoff JS
Pathol Res Pract; 1991 Mar; 187(2-3):129-44. PubMed ID: 2067992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pattern-based classification of invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma, depth of invasion measurement and distinction from adenocarcinoma in situ: interobserver variation among gynecologic pathologists.
Parra-Herran C; Taljaard M; Djordjevic B; Reyes MC; Schwartz L; Schoolmeester JK; Lastra RR; Quick CM; Laury A; Rasty G; Nucci MR; Howitt BE
Mod Pathol; 2016 Aug; 29(8):879-92. PubMed ID: 27174588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]