These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12497001)

  • 41. Microvessel density in prostate cancer: prognostic and therapeutic utility.
    Bostwick DG; Iczkowski KA
    Semin Urol Oncol; 1998 Aug; 16(3):118-23. PubMed ID: 9741415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3a disease.
    Freedland SJ; Partin AW; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC
    Cancer; 2007 Apr; 109(7):1273-8. PubMed ID: 17315165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy.
    Chuang AY; Nielsen ME; Hernandez DJ; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 17698141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prognostic indicators for long term outcome following radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer involving the seminal vesicles.
    Johnson CW; Anastasiadis AG; McKiernan JM; Salomon L; Eaton S; Goluboff ET; Olsson CA; Benson MC
    Urol Oncol; 2004; 22(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 15082006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
    Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prognostic significance of microvessel density in breast cancer of Thai women.
    Kanjanapanjapol S; Wongwaisayawan S; Phuwapraisirisan S; Wilasrusmee C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Feb; 90(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 17375633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Khan MA; Walsh PC; Miller MC; Bales WD; Epstein JI; Mangold LA; Partin AW; Veltri RW
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(12):2583-91. PubMed ID: 14669277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Caveolin-1 expression is a predictor of recurrence-free survival in pT2N0 prostate carcinoma diagnosed in Japanese patients.
    Satoh T; Yang G; Egawa S; Addai J; Frolov A; Kuwao S; Timme TL; Baba S; Thompson TC
    Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(5):1225-33. PubMed ID: 12599229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
    Sengupta S; Blute ML; Bagniewski SM; Inman B; Leibovich BC; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Zincke H
    BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of the prognostic potential of hyaluronic acid, hyaluronidase (HYAL-1), CD44v6 and microvessel density for prostate cancer.
    Ekici S; Cerwinka WH; Duncan R; Gomez P; Civantos F; Soloway MS; Lokeshwar VB
    Int J Cancer; 2004 Oct; 112(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 15305383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Radical prostatectomy as monotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer (T3a): 12 years follow-up].
    Isorna Martínez de la Riva S; Belón López-Tomasety J; Marrero Domínguez R; Alvarez Cruz E; Santamaría Blanco P
    Arch Esp Urol; 2004 Sep; 57(7):679-92. PubMed ID: 15536949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.
    Mitchell JA; Cooperberg MR; Elkin EP; Lubeck DP; Mehta SS; Kane CJ; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1126-31. PubMed ID: 15758720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Tumor-associated angiogenesis in prostate cancer.
    Fregene TA; Khanuja PS; Noto AC; Gehani SK; Van Egmont EM; Luz DA; Pienta KJ
    Anticancer Res; 1993; 13(6B):2377-81. PubMed ID: 7510938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
    San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
    J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
    Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
    May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
    Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.