These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12497731)
1. Wrongful death claims. Harriton v Stephens. [2002] NSWSC 461. Edwards v Blomeley. [2002] NSWSC 460. Waller v James [2002] NSWSC 462. Devereux J J Law Med; 2002 Nov; 10(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 12497731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Harriton, Waller And Australian negligence law: is there a place for wrongful life? Kapterian G J Law Med; 2006 Feb; 13(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 16506726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The concept of wrongful life in the law. Kasper AS Women Health; 1983; 8(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 6868627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why wrongful birth actions are right. Dimopoulos P; Bagaric M J Law Med; 2003 Nov; 11(2):230-8. PubMed ID: 14655586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wrongful life claim: Harriton (by her tutor) v Stephens; Waller (by his tutor) v James; Waller (by his tutor) v Hoolahan. Young R J Law Med; 2004 Aug; 12(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15359547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Wilson v. Kuenzi. Missouri. Supreme Court, en banc Wests South West Report; 1988 May; 751():741-9. PubMed ID: 12041300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The legal recognition of medical malpractice tort claims based upon theories of wrongful birth and wrongful life. Mayo KL North Carol Centr Law J; 1985; 15(2):274-94. PubMed ID: 11658795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abandoning the common law: medical negligence, genetic tests and wrongful life in the Australian High Court. Faunce T; Jefferys S J Law Med; 2007 May; 14(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 17571781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Wrongful life' lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue? Shapira A J Med Ethics; 1998 Dec; 24(6):369-75. PubMed ID: 9873975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis, wrongful birth and wrongful life: a global view of bioethical and legal controversies. Frati P; Fineschi V; Di Sanzo M; La Russa R; Scopetti M; Severi FM; Turillazzi E Hum Reprod Update; 2017 May; 23(3):338-357. PubMed ID: 28180264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wrongful birth and wrongful conception: the legal and moral issues. Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 6233171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Congenital disabilities and the law. Roth R Clin Perinatol; 2007 Jun; 34(2):263-73, v-vi. PubMed ID: 17572233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and distortion of justice in the law. Dickens BM Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 2628655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three state appellate courts would deny claims for "wrongful life" but would award some kind of damages to parents for "wrongful birth" of disabled child. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1979; 3(5):314-7. PubMed ID: 11665055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Wrongful life: a misconceived tort. Minott GD; Zurzolo VP Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1982 Dec; 4(10):7-31. PubMed ID: 10258102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The claim for wrongful conception. Forcing physicians to raise their patients' children. Savage D J Reprod Med; 1980 Feb; 24(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 7359502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A critique of the motivational analysis in wrongful conception cases. Alvarez IJ Boston Coll Law Rev; 2000 May; 41(3):585-626. PubMed ID: 16379092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harriton v Stephens; Waller v James; Waller v Hoolahan. Connors R J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):184-5. PubMed ID: 16304758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. It's a wonderful life: is it possible to say that a severely disabled child has been harmed by the mere fact of being born? Perry R Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Nov; 93(2):329-400. PubMed ID: 18354869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]