176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12497754)
1. [Systematic reviews in practice. X. Searching, selecting and the methodological assessment of diagnostic evaluation research].
Devillé WL; Bossuyt PM; de Vet HC; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM; Assendelft WJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(48):2281-4. PubMed ID: 12497754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Study design for the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 8796932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A refined symptom-based approach to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis in children.
Marais BJ; Gie RP; Hesseling AC; Schaaf HS; Lombard C; Enarson DA; Beyers N
Pediatrics; 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1350-9. PubMed ID: 17079536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of diagnostic tests.
Gjørup T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 166():9-14. PubMed ID: 9253371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a test. Main information indices].
Landais P; Besson C; Jais JP
J Radiol; 1995; 76(2-3):I-X. PubMed ID: 7714857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
Bailey B; Amre DK
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.
Hollingworth W; Medina LS; Lenkinski RE; Shibata DK; Bernal B; Zurakowski D; Comstock B; Jarvik JG
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 16777553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extensive evaluation of the instrumentation laboratory IL test D-Dimer immunoturbidimetric assay on the ACL 9000 determines the D-Dimer cutoff value for reliable exclusion of venous thromboembolism.
Curtin N; Highe G; Harris M; Braunstein A; Demattia F; Coss L
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 15224764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.
Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Heisterkamp SH
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1525-37. PubMed ID: 12111918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publishing nutrition research: validity, reliability, and diagnostic test assessment in nutrition-related research.
Gleason PM; Harris J; Sheean PM; Boushey CJ; Bruemmer B
J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Mar; 110(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 20184991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A search strategy for occupational health intervention studies.
Verbeek J; Salmi J; Pasternack I; Jauhiainen M; Laamanen I; Schaafsma F; Hulshof C; van Dijk F
Occup Environ Med; 2005 Oct; 62(10):682-7. PubMed ID: 16169913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.
Bowden SC; Loring DW
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Sep; 15(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 19635177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of diagnostic or screening procedures. Validity of tests, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values. Definition and indications for mass screening].
Durand-Zaleski I; Bastuji-Garin S
Rev Prat; 2000 May; 50(10):1155-8. PubMed ID: 10905104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A philosophical perspective supports the need for patient-outcome studies in diagnostic test evaluation.
Sonke GS; Verbeek AL; Kiemeney LA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 18619792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The measurement parameters and its significance of diagnostic tests].
Zhang ZY; Zheng JW; Yang C; Zhang SY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 15269847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
Doust JA; Pietrzak E; Sanders S; Glasziou PP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 15845330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
