204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12498433)
1. Ridge-lapping restorative crowns over endosteal and subperiosteal implant abutments.
Weiss CM
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 12498433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of prefabricated titanium tissue abutments for the construction of a maxillary subperiosteal implant.
Aras E; Sönmez M; Zora M; Basarir M; Kurtulmus H
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 16265856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediately restored, single-tapered implants in the anterior maxilla: prosthodontic and aesthetic outcomes after 1 year.
Hall JA; Payne AG; Purton DG; Torr B; Duncan WJ; De Silva RK
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 17362495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New prosthetic restorative features of Ankylos implant system.
Weigl P
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 15255395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-stage approach to aesthetic implant restoration: emergence profile concept.
Davarpanah M; Martinez H; Celletti R; Tecucianu JF
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(9):761-7; quiz 768, 721-2. PubMed ID: 11862927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of distraction implants for prosthetic treatment after vertical alveolar ridge distraction: a clinical investigation.
Feichtinger M; Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 12675450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical considerations for enhancing the success of implant-supported restorations in the aesthetic zone with delayed implant placement.
Raigrodski AJ; Block MS
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):21-8; quiz 30. PubMed ID: 11905157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple single-tooth implant restorations in the posterior jaws: maintenance of marginal bone levels with reference to the implant-abutment microgap.
Norton MR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):777-84. PubMed ID: 17066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Copy-milled all-ceramic Celay-InCeram crowns for modified CeraOne abutments: a technical report.
Pröbster L; Girthofer S; Groten M; Rein B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8666451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The abutment duplication technique: a novel protocol for cementable implant-supported restorations.
Cocchetto R; Resch I; Castagna M; Vincenzi G; Celletti R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 20664844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maximizing aesthetics, fit, and maintenance of the full-arch implant-supported porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration.
Tipton PA
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(5):395-400; quiz 402. PubMed ID: 12134391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study.
Andersson B; Taylor A; Lang BR; Scheller H; Schärer P; Sorensen JA; Tarnow D
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 12066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Achieving and maintaining predictable implant esthetics through the maintenance of bone around dental implants.
Stanford CM
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Sep; 23(9 Suppl 2):13-20. PubMed ID: 12790009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distraction osteogenesis and orthodontic therapy in the treatment of malpositioned osseointegrated implants: a case report.
Gotta S; Sarnachiaro GO; Tarnow DP
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 20(7):401-5. PubMed ID: 18807447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microgap or macrogap: significance of the marginal discrepancy between implant crown and abutment.
LaMar FR
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):207. PubMed ID: 15227768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
