BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12498437)

  • 1. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part I.
    Weinberg LA
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(6):293-301. PubMed ID: 12498437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics.
    Weinberg LA
    Implant Dent; 1998; 7(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 10196804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction of implant loading using a modified centric occlusal anatomy.
    Weinberg LA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 9588992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part II: therapeutic differential loading.
    Weinberg LA
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(6):302-10. PubMed ID: 12498438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of torque (moment) on implant/prosthesis with staggered buccal and lingual offset.
    Weinberg LA; Kruger B
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Jun; 16(3):252-65. PubMed ID: 9084311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone quality and the immediate loading of implants-critical aspects based on literature, research, and clinical experience.
    Romanos GE
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 19509530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols.
    Turkyilmaz I; Avci M; Kuran S; Ozbek EN
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 18031444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate loading using cross-arch fixed restorations in heavy smokers: nine consecutive case reports for edentulous arches.
    Romanos GE; Nentwig GH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):513-9. PubMed ID: 18700376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of bruxism on treatment planning for dental implants.
    Misch CE
    Dent Today; 2002 Sep; 21(9):76-81. PubMed ID: 12271847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthetic platforms in implant dentistry.
    Pita MS; Anchieta RB; Barão VA; Garcia IR; Pedrazzi V; Assunção WG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 22134269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months.
    Chou CT; Morris HF; Ochi S; Walker L; DesRosiers D
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15255390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
    Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in stability after healing of immediately loaded dental implants.
    Simunek A; Strnad J; Kopecka D; Brazda T; Pilathadka S; Chauhan R; Slezak R; Capek L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1085-92. PubMed ID: 21197483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.