1017 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12498456)
1. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli M; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12498456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydroxyapatite and silk combination-coated dental implants result in superior bone formation in the peri-implant area compared with hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated implants.
Kweon H; Lee SW; Hahn BD; Lee YC; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1928-36. PubMed ID: 25234528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of nicotine administration on different implant surfaces: a histometric study in rabbits.
Stefani CM; Nogueira F; Sallum EA; de TS; Sallum AW; Nociti FH
J Periodontol; 2002 Feb; 73(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 11895287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration.
Piattelli A; Degidi M; Paolantonio M; Mangano C; Scarano A
Biomaterials; 2003 Oct; 24(22):4081-9. PubMed ID: 12834604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Scarano A; Di Carlo F; Quaranta M; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 12614079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated titanium implants. The importance of the implant design.
Gottlander M; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Jun; 3(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15900671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli A; Manzon L; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Piattelli M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):805-10. PubMed ID: 9857591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
