These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12498463)
1. A synthetic bioactive resorbable graft for predictable implant reconstruction: part one. Valen M; Ganz SD J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):167-77. PubMed ID: 12498463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictable synthetic bone grafting procedures for implant reconstruction: part two. Ganz SD; Valen M J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 12498464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans. Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Tal H; Dayan D J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 11495140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation. Proussaefs P; Lozada J J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A histomorphometric evaluation of factors influencing the healing of bony defects surrounding implants. Pretorius JA; Melsen B; Nel JC; Germishuys PJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 15973950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study. Bystedt H; Rasmusson L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep. Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs. Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Martins MC; Zenóbio EG; Spolidoro LC; Marcantonio E Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18783409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs. Jung RE; Lecloux G; Rompen E; Ramel CF; Buser D; Hammerle CH Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 19191792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new porous hydroxyapatite for promotion of bone regeneration in maxillary sinus augmentation: clinical and histologic study in humans. Mangano C; Bartolucci EG; Mazzocco C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12608665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study. Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations. Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-year follow-up of larger-diameter implants placed in fresh extraction sockets using a resorbable membrane or a resorbable alloplastic material. Prosper L; Gherlone EF; Redaelli S; Quaranta M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):856-64. PubMed ID: 14696661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of a biomaterial on the closure of a marginal hard tissue defect adjacent to implants. An experimental study in the dog. Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Lindhe J Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 15142090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series. Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Part III: crystalline fluorapatite-coated hydroxyapatite; potential use as a bacteriostatic agent for both pre-implant cases and retreatment of infected implant sites: a report of 4 cases. Nordquist WD; Krutchkoff DJ J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 21028990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study. Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation using a synthetic nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitution material (Ostim): preliminary clinical and histological results. Strietzel FP; Reichart PA; Graf HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):743-51. PubMed ID: 17888015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]