190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12498464)
1. Predictable synthetic bone grafting procedures for implant reconstruction: part two.
Ganz SD; Valen M
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 12498464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A synthetic bioactive resorbable graft for predictable implant reconstruction: part one.
Valen M; Ganz SD
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):167-77. PubMed ID: 12498463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation alveolar ridge preservation with a beta-tricalcium phosphate socket graft.
Horowitz RA; Mazor Z; Miller RJ; Krauser J; Prasad HS; Rohrer MD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009; 30(9):588-90, 592, 594 passim; quiz 604, 606. PubMed ID: 19998726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients.
Urban IA; Nagursky H; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):404-14. PubMed ID: 21483894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite-bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: a comparative study in humans.
Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Tal H; Dayan D
J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):911-20. PubMed ID: 11495140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Guided bone regeneration: integration of a resorbable membrane and a bone graft material.
Kay SA; Wisner-Lynch L; Marxer M; Lynch SE
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1997 Mar; 9(2):185-94; quiz 196. PubMed ID: 12698525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report.
Tolstunov L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1723-9. PubMed ID: 19615588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Augmentation in two stages of atrophic alveolar bone prior to dental rehabilitation: a case report.
Zahrani AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 17846672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Localised maxillary ridge expansion with simultaneous implant placement: a case series.
Demarosi F; Leghissa GC; Sardella A; Lodi G; Carrassi A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 47(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 19150155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study.
Taylor JC; Cuff SE; Leger JP; Morra A; Anderson GI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 12074446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implantation. Clinical and histological observations in a case report.
Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):1062-7. PubMed ID: 9776036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sinus grafting with a natural fluorohydroxyapatite for immediate load: a study with histologic analysis and histomorphometry.
Lee CY; Rohrer MD; Prasad HS; Stover JD; Suzuki JB
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):164-75. PubMed ID: 19813420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advanced alveolar bone resorption treated with implants, guided bone regeneration, and synthetic grafting: a case report.
Naruse K; Fukuda M; Hasegawa H; Yagami K; Udagawa N
Implant Dent; 2010 Dec; 19(6):460-7. PubMed ID: 21119350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts 3 years after loading: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Merli M; Lombardini F; Esposito M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 20657877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
