182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12498465)
1. Use of an extraoral verification template for dental implant-supported prostheses.
Silverstein LH; Kurtzman GM; Schneider A; Shatz PC
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 12498465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving implant framework passive fit and accuracy through the use of verification stents and casts.
Schneider A; Kurtzman GM; Silverstein LH
J Dent Technol; 2001 Jun; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 11933718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The utilization of a preprosthetic extraoral verification stent for dental implant-supported reconstructions.
Silverstein LH; Kurtzman GM; Schneider A; Shatz PC
Dent Today; 2002 Jan; 21(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11824123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Technique for achieving a passive framework fit: a clinical case report.
Swallow ST
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 15119457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Master cast implant impression: using the open-tray technique.
Briley TF
Dent Implantol Update; 2002 Oct; 13(10):73-80. PubMed ID: 12455316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The one-model technique: a new method for immediate loading with fixed prostheses in edentulous or potentially edentulous jaws.
Biscaro L; Becattelli A; Poggio PM; Soattin M; Rossini F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 19537470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pickup impression technique for fabricating the surgical template for implant placement and provisional restoration.
Mitrani R; Phillips K
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 16(5):389-91. PubMed ID: 15344588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The three-dimensional casting distortion of five implant-supported frameworks.
Mitha T; Owen CP; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 19548406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A technique to verify or correct analogue position and soft tissue profile on an implant working cast.
Vitale ND; Tung F; Goldstein G
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 19703619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A technique for fabricating a 2-part surgical template.
Aljadi M; Thompson GA; Izumi M; Ziebert GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 21723994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a thermoplastic vacuum-formed matrix for secure engagement of an implant surgical template.
Oh WS; Saglik B
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):326-7. PubMed ID: 18922264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An implant-transfer technique without impression material.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Aparecida Delben J; dos-Santos PH; Ricardo Barão VA; Tabata LF
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1274-6. PubMed ID: 20613612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A modified occlusal registration and implant transfer technique.
Kaufman M; Cranin AN; Sayed A; Ley J; DeGrado J; Banton B
J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(3-4):258-62. PubMed ID: 9524504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vacuum-formed tooth position record as an index for the fabrication of an endosseous implant-supported prosthesis.
Cheng AC; Wee AG
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):546-8. PubMed ID: 11725284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wax teeth and metallic superstructure trials at the same session: simplified technique for implant-supported prosthesis.
Margonar R; de Almeida EO; Queiroz TP; Marcantonio E
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1960-2. PubMed ID: 21119469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
