155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12498947)
1. Experimental evaluation of indicators of nonlinearity for use in ultrasound transducer characterizations.
Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002; 28(11-12):1509-20. PubMed ID: 12498947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects on nonlinearity on the estimation of in situ values of acoustic output parameters.
Szabo TL; Clougherty F; Grossman C
J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 9952078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic measurements in a tissue mimicking liquid.
Macdonald MC; Madsen EL
J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 9952080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating in situ exposure in the presence of acoustic nonlinearity.
Duck FA
J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 9952079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental validation of a nonlinear derating technique based upon Gaussian-modal representation of focused ultrasound beams.
Dibaji SA; Banerjee RK; Liu Y; Soneson JE; Myers MR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2624. PubMed ID: 27250156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An exposimetry system using tissue-mimicking liquid.
Stiles TA; Madsen EL; Frank GR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 17720296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonlinear propagation and the output indices.
Carstensen EL; Dalecki D; Gracewski SM; Christopher T
J Ultrasound Med; 1999 Jan; 18(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 9952082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An iterative method for the computation of nonlinear, wide-angle, pulsed acoustic fields of medical diagnostic transducers.
Huijssen J; Verweij MD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 20058948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonlinear derating of high-intensity focused ultrasound beams using Gaussian modal sums.
Dibaji SA; Banerjee RK; Soneson JE; Myers MR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3435-45. PubMed ID: 24180754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phase and Amplitude Modulation Methods for Nonlinear Ultrasound Imaging With CMUTs.
Satir S; Degertekin FL
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Aug; 63(8):1086-92. PubMed ID: 27116737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of the repeatability and reproducibility of hydrophone measurements of medical ultrasound fields.
Martin E; Treeby B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Mar; 145(3):1270. PubMed ID: 31067926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonlinearity in a Medical Ultrasound Probe Under High Excitation Voltage.
Huynh T; Haugen GU; Eggen T; Hoff L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Mar; 68(3):784-795. PubMed ID: 32886609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design of HIFU Transducers for Generating Specified Nonlinear Ultrasound Fields.
Rosnitskiy PB; Yuldashev PV; Sapozhnikov OA; Maxwell AD; Kreider W; Bailey MR; Khokhlova VA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Feb; 64(2):374-390. PubMed ID: 27775904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Design and acoustic characterization of limited diffraction ultrasonic devices.
Aulet A; Núñez I; Moreno E; Eiras JA; Negreira CA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2737-40. PubMed ID: 21117721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods to calibrate the absolute receive sensitivity of single-element, focused transducers.
Rich KT; Mast TD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL193-8. PubMed ID: 26428812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of in situ exposure to ultrasound: an acoustical attenuation method.
Preston RC; Shaw A; Zeqiri B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 1949344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploitation of capacitive micromachined transducers for nonlinear ultrasound imaging.
Novell A; Legros M; Felix N; Bouakaz A
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Dec; 56(12):2733-43. PubMed ID: 20040410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast prediction of pulsed nonlinear acoustic fields from clinically relevant sources using time-averaged wave envelope approach: comparison of numerical simulations and experimental results.
Wójcik J; Kujawska T; Nowicki A; Lewin PA
Ultrasonics; 2008 Dec; 48(8):707-15. PubMed ID: 18474387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.
Liu Y; Wear KA; Harris GR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2329-2342. PubMed ID: 28735734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design and characterization of a high-power ultrasound driver with ultralow-output impedance.
Lewis GK; Olbricht WL
Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Nov; 80(11):114704. PubMed ID: 19947748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
