These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12499009)
21. Implementation of advanced Optimum Contribution Selection in small-scale breeding schemes: prospects and challenges in Vorderwald cattle. Kohl S; Wellmann R; Herold P Animal; 2020 Mar; 14(3):452-463. PubMed ID: 31597583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stochastic modeling of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer breeding schemes in small closed dairy cattle populations. Jeon GJ; Mao IL; Jensen J; Ferris TA J Dairy Sci; 1990 Jul; 73(7):1938-44. PubMed ID: 2229596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. Meuwissen TH; Van Arendonk JA J Dairy Sci; 1992 Jun; 75(6):1651-9. PubMed ID: 1500565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in dairy cattle. Ponsart C; Le Bourhis D; Knijn H; Fritz S; Guyader-Joly C; Otter T; Lacaze S; Charreaux F; Schibler L; Dupassieux D; Mullaart E Reprod Fertil Dev; 2013; 26(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 24305173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls. de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes. Spelman RJ; Garrick DJ J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 9839238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study. Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors affecting oocyte quality and quantity in commercial application of embryo technologies in the cattle breeding industry. Merton JS; de Roos AP; Mullaart E; de Ruigh L; Kaal L; Vos PL; Dieleman SJ Theriogenology; 2003 Jan; 59(2):651-74. PubMed ID: 12499010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Expected increases in genetic merit from using optimized contributions in two livestock populations of beef cattle and sheep. Avendaño S; Villanueva B; Woolliams JA J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):2964-75. PubMed ID: 14677851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Towards an embryocentric world: the current and potential uses of embryo technologies in dairy production. Hansen PJ; Block J Reprod Fertil Dev; 2004; 16(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 14972098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle. Berry DP; Wall E; Pryce JE Animal; 2014 May; 8 Suppl 1():105-21. PubMed ID: 24703258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The advantage of factorial mating under selection is uncovered by deterministically predicted rates of inbreeding. Sørensen AC; Berg P; Woolliams JA Genet Sel Evol; 2005; 37(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 15588568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assisted reproductive techniques for cattle breeding in developing countries: a critical appraisal of their value and limitations. Rodriguez-Martinez H Reprod Domest Anim; 2012 Jan; 47 Suppl 1():21-6. PubMed ID: 22212208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mendelian sampling terms as a selective advantage in optimum breeding schemes with restrictions on the rate of inbreeding. Avendaño S; Woolliams JA; Villanueva B Genet Res; 2004 Feb; 83(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15125067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]