113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12500385)
1. IVP or CT for suspected urolithiasis: reply.
Worster A; Haines T
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2002 Dec; 53(5):307-8. PubMed ID: 12500385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic assessment of painless microhematuria: prospective study comparing image quality, assessibility and diagnostic certainty of multidetector-row CT and intravenous pyelography within a single examination].
Michael M; John H; Wildermuth S; Ruedi C; Marincek B; Boehm T
Rofo; 2005 Oct; 177(10):1436-46. PubMed ID: 16170715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urolithiasis: detection and management with unenhanced spiral CT--a urologic perspective.
Preminger GM; Vieweg J; Leder RA; Nelson RC
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):308-9. PubMed ID: 9577473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Renal colic: a prospective evaluation of non-enhanced spiral CT versus intravenous pyelography.
Mendelson RM; Arnold-Reed DE; Kuan M; Wedderburn AW; Anderson JE; Sweetman G; Bulsara MK; Mander J
Australas Radiol; 2003 Mar; 47(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 12581050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IVP or CT for suspected urolithiasis.
Butler G; Somers S; Stolberg H; Thomson JG
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2002 Oct; 53(4):241. PubMed ID: 12391931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The role of intravenous urography in the diagnosis of urinary tract lithiasis in the era of new therapeutical methods].
Novac C; Pricop C; Negru D; Gheorghiu V; Negru I
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2002; 106(4):851-5. PubMed ID: 14974244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does replacing intravenous pyelography with noncontrast helical computed tomography benefit patients with suspected acute urolithiasis?
Worster A; Haines T
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2002 Jun; 53(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 12101535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective view of "diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT".
Zagoria RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):603-4. PubMed ID: 16928918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Imaging patients with renal colic: a comparative analysis of the impact of non-contrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography on the speed of patient processing in the Emergency Department.
Quirke M; Divilly F; O'Kelly P; Winder S; Gilligan P
Emerg Med J; 2011 Mar; 28(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 20581407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can we renounce performing the intravenous urography in the preoperative evaluation for ESWL treatment?
Budau M; Chira I; Ambert V; Pascu M; Radu M; Onu M; Pop T; Persu S; Popescu M; Braticevici B
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Jun; 74(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 12161936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of spiral computed tomography without contrast media and intravenous urography in the diagnosis of renal colic].
Thibeau JF; Sourtzis S; Bellemans MA; Vandendris M
Prog Urol; 1999 Apr; 9(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 10370946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of unenhanced computerized tomography urography in the evaluation of acute renal colic.
Wang JH; Lin WC; Wei CJ; Chang CY
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2003 Oct; 19(10):503-9. PubMed ID: 14620676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Urolithiasis, CT and lithotripsy guidelines].
Scherrer A; Mellot F; Botto H; Lebret T
J Radiol; 2000 Sep; 81(9 Suppl):1039-51. PubMed ID: 10995490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Retirement plan for a 70-year-old. Intravenous urography disembarks from uroradiology].
Thomsen HS; Lindequist S; Brems-Dalgaard E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Mar; 164(11):1484-8. PubMed ID: 11924471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain.
Niall O; Russell J; MacGregor R; Duncan H; Mullins J
J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):534-7. PubMed ID: 9915442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Drip infusion pyelography.
Evans GH; Scardino PL
South Med J; 1967 Dec; 60(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 6060743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of spiral CT and US in the evaluation of pediatric urolithiasis.
Oner S; Oto A; Tekgul S; Koroglu M; Hascicek M; Sahin A; Akhan O
JBR-BTR; 2004; 87(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 15587558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urinary calculus: IVU vs. CT renal stone? A critically appraised topic.
Shine S
Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 17786506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis.
Worster A; Preyra I; Weaver B; Haines T
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Sep; 40(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 12192351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficacy of urinalysis, plain films, and spiral CT in ED patients with suspected renal colic.
Eray O; Cubuk MS; Oktay C; Yilmaz S; Cete Y; Ersoy FF
Am J Emerg Med; 2003 Mar; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 12671819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
