203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12500776)
1. Inducing and reducing false memories: a Swedish version of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Johansson M; Stenberg G
Scand J Psychol; 2002 Dec; 43(5):369-83. PubMed ID: 12500776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reported serial positions of true and illusory memories in the Deese/Roediger/McDermott paradigm.
Prohaska V; DelValle D; Toglia MP; Pittman AE
Memory; 2016 Aug; 24(7):865-83. PubMed ID: 26275167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. False memory in a short-term memory task.
Coane JH; McBride DM; Raulerson BA; Jordan JS
Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 17341016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maltreatment increases spontaneous false memories but decreases suggestion-induced false memories in children.
Otgaar H; Howe ML; Muris P
Br J Dev Psychol; 2017 Sep; 35(3):376-391. PubMed ID: 28093783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories.
Oliver MC; Bays RB; Miller C
J Vis Exp; 2018 Nov; (141):. PubMed ID: 30507920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How are false memories distinguishable from true memories in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm? A review of the findings.
Jou J; Flores S
Psychol Res; 2013 Nov; 77(6):671-86. PubMed ID: 23266577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hypnotizability, not suggestion, influences false memory development.
Dasse MN; Elkins GR; Weaver CA
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2015; 63(1):110-28. PubMed ID: 25365130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normative data for Italian Deese/Roediger-McDermott lists.
Iacullo VM; Marucci FS
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 25788416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories.
Chan JC; McDermott KB; Watson JM; Gallo DA
Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 16156175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of test structure in creating false memories.
Coane JH; McBride DM
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1026-36. PubMed ID: 17128601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of early list manipulations on the DRM illusion.
Fam J; Huff MJ; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Nov; 74(11):1924-1934. PubMed ID: 33840269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False recognition and word length: a reanalysis of Roediger, Watson, McDermott, and Gallo (2001) and some new data.
Madigan S; Neuse J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):567-73. PubMed ID: 15376812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False recall and recognition of brand names increases over time.
Sherman SM
Memory; 2013; 21(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 22963741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test-induced priming of false memories.
Marsh EJ; Dolan PO
Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 17874592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Affective valence influences participant's susceptibility to false memories and illusory recollection.
Dehon H; Larøi F; Van der Linden M
Emotion; 2010 Oct; 10(5):627-39. PubMed ID: 21038946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of suggestion in the DRM paradigm: what state of consciousness is associated with false memory?
Plancher G; Nicolas S; Piolino P
Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1114-22. PubMed ID: 18835190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
Watson JM; Bunting MF; Poole BJ; Conway AR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 15641906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective warnings in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott false-memory paradigm: the role of identifiability.
Neuschatz JS; Benoit GE; Payne DG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 12549581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attempting to avoid false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm: assessing the combined influence of practice and warnings in young and old adults.
Watson JM; McDermott KB; Balota DA
Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 15078050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.
Knott LM; Dewhurst SA
Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1954-65. PubMed ID: 18265611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
